Department of Correction, 34 MCSR xxx (2021); Brunelle v. Massachusetts Dept of Transp., 33 MCSR 370 (2020); Hartnett v. Department of Revenue, 30 MCSR 398 (2017); Baran v. Department of Conservation & Recreation, 18 MCSR 355 (2005). See generally, Boston Police Dept v. Jones, 98 Mass.App.Ct. 762 (2020) (in general, voluntary overtime and detail pay are not part of the regular compensation of a tenured civil servant).

Department of Correction, 91 Mass.App.Ct. 1108 (Rule 1:28) (2017), citing Mello v. Mayor of Fall River, 22 Mass.App.Ct. 974, rev.den. 398 Mass. 1104 (1986) 12 sworn affidavits from the Police Commissioner and nine other BPD personnel known to have had contact with Officer McGoldrick during the investigation of the November 12, 2015 incident and the circumstances leading up to her resignation on July 18, 2016.

In Lecorps v Department of Correction, G1-12-207 (December 19, 35 2013), the Appellant appealed his bypass based on a hair drug test in which he tested positive for marihuana. The Appellant averred that he innocently ingested marijuana when he ate pastries at a party prior to the drug test. The Commission found, it is simply not credible that he ingested marihuana without knowing it.

Department of Correction, 9 MCSR 2 (1996)) 10. On October 16, 1992, Certification No. 2009779 for one temporary Accountant IV was issued to DEP. No appointments were made from this certification. The Appellants name appeared as #60. (HRD Reply) 1], On October 15, 1993, Certification No. 1009498 for one temporary Accountant IV was issued to DEP. Wayne Eaton (#40) was selected for appointment to this position.

Department of Correction, 27 MCSR 325 (2014) and cases cited (in an appropriate case, appointing authority may rely on credible evidence that the employee admitted to felonious conduct whether or not the employee was actually found guilty of the offense).

Section 1 of Chapter 30A defines agencies, specifically providing that the definition, does not include the following: the legislative and judicial departments; the governor and council; military or naval boards, commissions or officials; the department of correction; the department of youth services; the parole board; the division of dispute resolution of the division of industrial accidents; the personnel administrator; the civil service commission

Department of Correction, 32 MCSR 377 (2019)). Particularly with the additional passage of time that occurred here, the BPD has failed to show that there is a sufficient nexus between three prior incidents of alleged misconduct, two of which occurred when the Appellant was a teenager (age 16 and 19), and his current ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of a Boston police officer.

The Appellant has been employed with the Massachusetts Department of Correction (DOC) as a Correction Officer I (CO I). He served as a police officer for the Town of Weymouths Police Department (WPD) from June 2011 to July 2017. After resigning from the WPD, he worked with the Department of Homeland Security and as a mail carrier for the United States Post Office. (Ex. 5; Appellant Testimony). Employment with WPD 3.

The pilot program of one mobile phone in light of the recent Department of Correction inspection was a core managerial decision and thus bargaining was not required. Additionally, the pilot program did not alter the terms and conditions of employment at the HOC. Any change was de minimus at best. This situation is comparable to the facts in Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 17 MLC the complaint filed by NAGE 1282 (1990).

Violent Offender: for any parolee who is (a) paroled on a Department of Correction sentence(s) that includes a violent crime or firearm possession, or (b) paroled on a House of Correction sentence, but has a prior DOC sentence for a violent crime or firearm possession. - , House of Correction Firearm Offender: for any parolee who is. paroled on a sentence that involves a firearm (possession, ABDW/gun, | ADW/gun). _ . 2. LEVELS a.