Working for the Red Sox, the Appellant received training in screening fans, dealing with disorderly fans, looking for suspicious activity, breaking up physical altercations, and interacting with Boston Police. In his security work at Fenway, the Appellant interacted with Boston Police, for example, when pre-entry screening of ticket holders indicated that a person had a firearm, and when the Boston Police Bomb Squad trained Fenway security.
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS INTRODUCTION Pursuant to G.L. c. 0A, 14, the plaintiff, Tyrone Smith (Smith), brings this action for judicial review of a Massachusetts Civil Service Commission (Commission) decision upholding the determination of the Boston Police Department (Department) suspending Smith for ten days based on alleged violations of Department rules.
Based on the exhibits submitted at the hearing and the testimony of the following witnesses: For the Appointing Authority: Robin Hunt, Human Resources Director, Boston Police Department; For the Appellant: Daniel Ciccolo, Boston Police Department; Joseph Coppinger, Boston Municipal Protective Services; Paul DeLeo, Boston Police Department; Kathleen Durepo, Boston Police Department; Daniel Linskey, Boston Police Department; Mark McKeown
L. c. 31, 44, Stacey Hightower (plaintiff) brought this action against the Civil Service Commission (Commission) and the Boston Police Department (Department), seeking judicial review of the Commissions final decisions to uphold the plaintiff's one day suspension and to deny plaintiff's request to expunge information from her personnel file.
D-08-219 BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Appellants Attorney: John J. Hightower, Esq. Alex G. Henlin, Esq. Robbins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP 800 Boylston Street: 25th Floor Boston, MA 02199 Respondents Attorney: Nicole I. Taub, Esq. Boston Police Department Office of the Legal Advisor One Schroeder Plaza Boston, MA 02120 Commissioner: Christopher C.
L. c. 30A, $114 and G.L. c. 31, 44, for judicial review of the defendant, Civil Service Commission s (the Commission, decision allowing the defendant, David Sane s Cupra) appeal of his termination from the Boston Police Department. The Departmen! s Watton for | Judgment on the Pienainestis now before the court.
SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 1684-CV02878-D BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT VS. SDANTEL ZAITER and MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Loe) a a: 2 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER ONPLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS {> Introduction = The Boston Police Department (BPD) moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to G.
CASE NO: D-10-120 Boston Police Department, Respondent Appellants Attorney: Edward J. McNelley, Atty. Barnicle, McNelley & Nugent 101 Tremont St. Suite 700 Boston, MA Respondents Attorney: 02108 Amanda Wall, Atty. Boston Police Department Office of the Legal Advisor One Schroeder Plaza Boston, MA Commissioner: 02120 Daniel M. Henderson DECISION The Appellant, Sgt. Detective Robert Tinker, (hereafter Appellant or Sgt.
3 documents · ·City of Framingham ·Fulfilled
Mayor's Office and residents Advanced the Mayor at community events e Coordinated with city agencies, including Boston Police, Fire, Public Works, Transportation, and Inspectional Services to deliver quality and timely municipal services to residents Organized community meetings Researched Mayor's Office recommendations economic and real estate developments matters before the Zoning Board of Appeals, Boston Planning and Redevelopment Authority, and
Based on the documents submitted, the testimony of the following witnesses: Called by the Boston Police Department: Sgt. Det. Gary Eblan, Boston Police Department Superintendent Frank Mancini, Boston Police Department Called by Brandon Castater: Brandon Castater, Appellant Ms.