See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728, 792 N.E.2d 711, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108, 799 N.E.2d 594 (2003); Police Dept of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411, 721 N.E.2d 928, rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commn, 38 Mass App.Ct. 473, 477, 648 N.E.2d 1312 (1995); Town of 4 Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331, 451 N.E.2d 443, rev.den., 390 Mass. 1102, 453 N.E.2d 1231 (1983).

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is "justified" when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law." Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is "justified" when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass, App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is "justified" when it is "done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law." Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Ct. 473, 477 (1995); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). The Legislature has provided HRD discretion over the creation, maintenance, expiration and revocation of eligible lists and, consequently, the establishment and issuance of certifications from those eligible lists. G.L. c.31 25(a).

See also City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728, rev.den., 440 Mass. 1108, (2003); Police Dept of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411, rev.den., 726 N.E.2d 417 (2000); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commn, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 473, 477, (1995); Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 331, rev.den., 390 Mass. 1102, 453 N.E.2d 1231 (1983).

Comm'n, 447 Mass, 814, 823 (2006); City of Leominster v, Stratton, 58 Mass, App.

Kennedy Interim Chief of Police Leominster Police Department 29 Church Street Leominster, MA 01453 Dear Interim Chief Kennedy: I have received the petition of Andrew Quemere appealing the response of the Leominster Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on September 4, 2020, Mr.

Murray Supervisor of Records Ned Pratt Director of Pupil Personnel Services Leominster Public Schools 24 Church Street Leominster, MA 01453 May 16, 2023 SPR23/0896 Dear Director Pratt: I have received the petition of Attorney Kathleen Stathulis, Esq., of The Center for Public Interest, Advocacy, and Collaboration of Northeastern University School of Law, appealing the nonresponse of the Leominster Public Schools (School) to a request for public records

Telephone Number Email Address 508-860-1447 mterry@mirickoconnell.com Employer's Representative's Address (street and no., city/town, state, and zip code) Mirick O'Connell, 1800 West Park Dr., Westborough, MA 10. 978-534-7775 01453 Marc L, Terry 8. 4, Fax Number Employer's Address (street and no., city/town, state, and zip code) 24 Church Street, Leominster, MA 9. Fax Number 01581-3926 508-207-9345 Labor Organization's Name 11.