Department of Correction, 28 MCSR 330, 333 (2015); Camacho v. Mass. Environmental Police, 28 MCSR 18, 20 (2015). Conclusion For all the reasons stated above, the appeal of Yasmine Estrella filed under Docket No. G1-23-055 is hereby allowed. Pursuant to its authority under Chapter 310 of the Acts of 1993, the Commission hereby orders the following: 1.

Department of Correction, 27 MCSR 327 (2014)(Correction Program Officer appeal denied); Messier v. Department of Correction, 13 MCSR 204 (2000)(Clerk III appeal denied); Lefebvre v. Department of Early Education and Care, 22 MCSR 149 (2009)(Administrative Assistant II appeal allowed); McCollum v. Department of Environmental Protection, 15 MCSR 23 (2002)(Environmental Engineer VI appeal denied); Towns v.

University Clarksburg Police Department Clinton Police Department Cohasset Police Department College of the Holy Cross Colrain Police Department Concord Police Department Conway Police Department Cummington Police Department Curry College Dalton Police Department Danvers Police Department Dartmouth Police Department Dean College Dedham Police Department Deerfield Police Department Dennis Police Department Department of Conservation and Recreation Department

Department of Correction . 19 MCSR 337 (2006); Downer v. Town of Burlington. 19 MCSR 411 (2006)), the Town, in this case has opted only to impose a thirty-day suspension. Mr. Blais should consider himself fortunate to still be employed by the Framingham Police Department.

Department of Correction, 8 MCSR 179 (1995). In the Appellants case, the Citys requests were reasonable, and the Appellants failure to comply with the Citys requests was unreasonable and constituted insubordination.

Department of Correction, 475 Mass. 1006 (2016) (rights to assault pay terminate upon employee's separation from employment even though rights to workers' compensation benefits would continue). There is one grievance that has been submitted to arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. An arbitrator has been agreed upon by the parties and the hearing dates have been offered.

The Appellant, Michael Connors, has been employed as a correction officer at the ' Department of Correction (DOC) since November 201 L. He is assigned to MCI Framingham. (Testimony of Appellant; Exhibit 7.) 2, The Appellant took and passed the civil service examination for entry-level police officer on April 30, 2011. He received a score of 85. (Testimony of Appellant; Exhibit 1.) Michael Connors v. City of Somerville 3. Somerville. 4.

He is currently employed as a Correction Officer with the Massachusetts Department of Correction (DOC), a position he has held for approximately five years. His DOC employment has involved law enforcement training and experience, including the handling of chemical agents and weapons, as well as de-escalation and use of force tactics. (Appellants November 15, 2016 letter) 2. Mr.

Department of Correction, 28 MCSR 82 (2015); Allison v. City of Cambridge, 27 MCSR 379 (2014); Higgins v. Boston Public Schools, 25 MCSR 416 (2012); Sullivan v. City of Boston, 20 MCSR 11 (2007) Since I conclude that Boston is correct that MMs and MM1 properly are grouped together in the same title, the Commission lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal by Mr. 6 Mr.

Department of Correction, 21 MCSR 647, 688 (2008).