Between October 2014 and February 2016, the Alliance proposed that the funds referred to in paragraph 17 be distributed for automobile allowances, reimbursement of fingerprinting costs, summer programming, clothing allowances and _ classification/compensation adjustments for certain bargaining unit members employed by the Department of Correction, Department of Public Health, Department of Transitional Assistance, Department of Mental Health, Massachusetts

Between October 2014 and February 2016, the Alliance proposed that the funds referred to in paragraph 17 be distributed for automobile allowances, reimbursement of fingerprinting costs, summer programming, clothing allowances and _ classification/compensation adjustments for certain bargaining unit members employed by the Department of Correction, Department of Public Health, Department of Transitional Assistance, Department of Mental Health, Massachusetts

Department of Correction, 21 MCRS 647, 688 (2008). An appointing authority may bypass a candidate applying for a law enforcement position based on criminal charges even though the charges were ultimately dismissed. See, e.g. Cavaco v. Department of Correction, 27 MCSR 436.

Department of Correction, 23 MCSR 696 (2011) (road rage and public lewdness at rest stop); Cullen v. Department of Correction, 21 MCSR 220 (2008) (off-duty exposure in vehicle parked on public street); Marino v.

Department of Correction, 434 Mass. 40, 49-50 (2001) (where statute did not "distinguish between total and partial workers' compensation benefits," plain language of statute did not permit "reduction of assault pay benefits for partial disability status" for correction officers). 14 c. Special police officer. By contrast, the role of special police officer is not well defined by statute6 or case law.

The Appellant started as a cadet in the Department of Corrections (hereinafter DOC) Academy on February 18, 2007. (Testimony of Appellant) 7. Robin Hunt, (hereinafter Director Hunt), the Director of Human Resources for the BPD, testified about the hiring process for becoming an officer. She explained that every candidate must first submit an application to the BPD.

Department of Correction, 13 MCSR 159 (2000) (Commission upholds bypass where applicants answers to situational scenarios did not comply with department policies and procedures and failed to demonstrate an ability to lead); McMahon v.

Department of Correction and DPA , 9 MCSR 2, 5 (1996) (Commission approves oneday appointments in special circumstances.) The City took the action because, but for an unanticipated and unusual fiscal crisis, the promotions would have been permanent from the outset. The demoted officers were reinstated to sergeant permanently when funding became available, rather than filling the positions from the then current list.

The records SUPL were also consolidated. case. 15-4992 that is identical to Hunters However, | am issuing separate decisions for each Dismissal (Cont'd) SUPL-15-5006 The Union represents a unit of employees employed by the Massachusetts Department of Correction (Employer). There are over 4000 employees in the unit. On June 1, 2015, Walter W.

Department of Correction, 440 (2010); Bianco v. Newton Fire Dept, 20 MCSR 23 MCSR 241 (2007); Keegan v. City of Quincy, 19 MCSR 440 (2006); Coughlin vy Plymouth Police Dept, 19 MCSR 434 (2006); Dalrymple y.

Department of Correction, 20 MCSR 152 (2007); Lavaud v. Boston Police Department, 17 MCSR 125 (2004); Brooks v. Boston Police Department, 14 MCSR 109 (2001); Gallo v. City of Lynn, 23 MCSR 348 (2010); Cruz v. City of Lowell, 25 MCSR 255 (2012). One decision that is less distinguishable, however, is Benevento v.