Address 201 Warren St Ext 24, FAX Number Peabody MA 01960 LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 25. Name Phillip Durkin 26. Title Attorney 27,28,29,30. Address 7 Essex Green Drive, Unit 5 31. Telephone Number 978-406-4222 Peabody MA 01960 34. FAX Number 32. E-mail Address pdurkin@scalawyers.com 33. Firm/Organization Name Law Offices of Phillip T. Durkin 35. NATURE OF EMPLOYER'S Municipal Light Plant BUSINESS: 36.

Telephone Number 978-531-5975 20,21,22,23, Address 24, FAX Number 201 Warren St Ext Peabody MA 01960 LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 25, Name 26. Title Phillip Durkin Attorney 27,28,29,30, Address 7 Essex Green Drive, Unit 5 31. Telephone Number 978-406-4222 Peabody MA 01960 34, FAX Number 32, E-mail Address pdurkin@scalawyers.com 33, Firm/Organization Name Law Offices of Phillip T.

Moreover, the Town has effectively implemented a new policy, without bargaining with the Union, that allows for the discipline and/or discharge for any employee who is deemed in violation of said policy (See City of Lowell, 28 MLC 126 (2001); City of Peabody, 9 MLC 1447 (1982)). This panopticon style of surveillance of bargaining unit members is a violation of Section 10(a)(5), and derivatively Section 10(a)(1) of the Law. 8.

Moreover, the Town has effectively implemented a new policy, without bargaining with the Union, that allows for the discipline and/or discharge for any employee who is deemed in violation of said policy (See City of Lowell, 28 MLC 126 (2001); City of Peabody, 9 MLC 1447 (1982)). This panopticon style of surveillance of bargaining unit members is a violation of Section 10(a)(5), and derivatively Section 10(a)(1) of the Law. 8.

FAX Number Peabody MA 01960 LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 25. Name 26. Title Phillip Durkin Attorney 27,28,29,30. Address 7 Essex Green Drive, Unit 5 31. Telephone Number 978-406-4222 Peabody MA 01960 34. FAX Number 32. E-mail Address 33. Firm/Organization Name Law Offices of Phillip T. Durkin pdurkin@scalawyers.com 35. NATURE OF EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS: Municipal Light Plant 36. Description of Unit: Public Light Plant Employees 37.

See City of Peabody, 28 MLC 281, 284, MUP-2162 (March 6, 2002). The Investigator dismissed the Section 10(a)(3) allegation on grounds that the Union had failed to establish that the Employer took adverse action against Zarella.

See Southbridge School Committee, 41 MLC 199 (2015)( plaintiff failed to prove adverse action element of a prima facie case of unlawful retaliation where there was no evidence that he had been disadvantaged with respect to salary, grade, or other objective terms and conditions of employment); City of Peabody, 28 MLC 281 (2002)(A letter, standing alone, does not constitute an adverse action absent evidence that the letter was punitive in any way, warned

Fax Number Kiley Brothers Memorial School, 21 Johnson Street, Peabody, MA 01960 7. Employee Organization 8. Representative to contact Jill Coleman Peabody School Administrators Association 9. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) Mass Teachers Assn.. 50 Salem Street, Bldg. B, Lynnfield, MA 01940 12. Describe existing bargaining unit (attach additional sheets if necessary): Included August ugust 31, 31, 2011 15.

City of Peabody, 25 MLC 191, 192-193, MUP-9861 (May 20, 1999). For an employee to be entitled to union representation, the meeting must be investigatory in nature. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 22 MLC 1741, 1747, SUP-4105 (May 16, 1996). The right to union representation attaches when the employee reasonably believes that the investigation will result in discipline and the employee makes a valid request for union representation. Id.

City of Peabody (2010). 5 Either party may file a motion for reconsideration within ten days of the receipt of this decision. The motion must identify a clerical or mechanical error in the decision or a significant factor the Agency or the Presiding Officer may have overlooked in deciding the case.

Bowman DECISION ON RESPONDENTS MOTION TO DISMISS On October 5, 2021, the Appellant, Timothy Sullivan (Appellant), a police lieutenant with the City of Peabody (City)s Police Department, filed an examination appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), contesting his education and experience (E&E) score on a recent promotional examination for Police Captain.

be a resident of a different member town of the North Shore Vocational Regior nal School District; 3 of whom from the Essex agricultural and technical high school to be appo Inted by the chairman of the board of trustees of the Essex agricultural and technical high sq Nool and shall be residents of a municipality in Essex county with students currently attending b Essex agricultural and technical high school: 1 of whom shall be a resident of the city

shall be a resident of a different member town of the North Shore Vocational Regional School District: 3 of whom from the Essex agricultural and technical high school to be appointed by the chairman of the board of trustees of the Essex agricultural and technical high school and shall be residents of a municipality in Essex county with students currently attending Essex agricultural and technical high school; 1 of whom shall be a resident of the city