Date Employee Signature Union Representative Signature THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, BOSTON, MA 02108 DEVAL L. PATRICK JAY GONZALEZ Governor TIMOTHY P.

On December 15, 2020, the states Human Resources Division (HRD) established the eligible list for Brookline Police Sergeant. D. In 2023, there was one vacancy for the position of Brookline Police Sergeant. E. The Appellant was ranked first among those willing to accept promotional appointment. F. The BPD selected a candidate ranked below the Appellant for promotional appointment. G.

/s/ Melinda Willis Labor Counsel Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place, Rm. 211 Boston, MA 02108 melinda.willis@state.ma.us (617) 878-9777 Date: March 1, 2018 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Melinda T.

/s/ Melinda Willis___________ Labor Counsel Human Resources Division One Ashburton Place, Rm. 211 Boston, MA 02108 melinda.willis@state.ma.us (617) 878-9777 Date: October 18, 2017 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Melinda T.

At this time, the Department is waiting for further details from the Human Resources Division Legal Department on how the new law will be implemented throughout the Commonwealth. As soon as further details arrive | will be sure to forward to you all the information we receive. We expect to hear from HRD shortly.

.: SUP-20-7876 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS / SECRETARY OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION Respondent RESPONDENTS ANSWER 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) Admitted. Admitted. Admitted. Admitted. Admitted. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Melinda T.

Respondent Exhibits a) DOC Code of Conduct b) Interview Intro Template c) November 2019 Email Exchange between Sean Mullen and Investigation Witness A. d) Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Human Resources Division, Policy of Zero Tolerance for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence.

The following certified eligible lists for promotional appointments in the Springfield Fire Department have been reported to be currently active and approved by the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD): a. Fire Lieutenant - List containing 11 names established 5/14/2010 b. Fire Captain List containing 5 names established on or about April 2009. c. District Chief List containing 3 names established on or about November 2008. 2.

The position of sanitation inspector is classified as an official service position in the Municlass Manual maintained by the states Human Resources Division (hereinafter HRD).

Submissions have been received on this matter from counsel on behalf of the Appellant, the Appointing Authority and the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD). After consideration of the submissions, the Commission acts, pursuant to 801 C.M.R. 1.01(7) (g)(3), to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 1 STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS 1.

On November 1, 2013, the states Human Resources Division (HRD) placed Mr. Kellys name on an eligible list of candidates for Boston Police Officer. 3. On April 27, 2015, HRD sent Certification No. 02742 to the BPD from which it eventually appointed seventy (70) police officers. 4. On July 21, 2015, Mr. Kelly, after undergoing a background investigation, was given a conditional offer of employment by the BPD.

On July 6, 2011, the Town requested a certification from the states Human Resources Division (HRD) to appoint three (3) permanent, full-time police officers. 1 3. On August 25, 2011, HRD sent Certification No. 201127 to the Town. Mr. Silvias name appeared high enough on this Certification to be within the statutory 2N +1 formula and be considered for employment. 4. Sometime after August 25, 2011, Mr.

The appointing authority ultimately requested and obtained permission from the personnel administrator of the Massachusetts Human Resources Division to 'bypass' him in accordance with G. L. c. 31, 27. The Civil Service Commission (commission) reversed and ordered that the city recertify Suppa, concluding that the appointing authority's decision was unsupported by substantial evidence.