Sincerely written, GM Ogaldez, Correction Officer 1 According to the Massachusetts Blue Book Rules & Regulations Department ofCorrection the following guidelines are in place to ensure that employee actions are to be both respectful and professional.
Decision (cont'd) SUMMARY The issues in these cases Massachusetts/Commissioner of are case Administration whether: a) the (Employer), Commonwealth acting through of the Department ofCorrections (DOC), violated Section 10(a)(3), and, derivatively Section 10(a)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law) by retaliating against Glennis Ogaldez (Ogaldez); Union (MCOFU and b) the Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated or Union) violated
Decision (cont'd) SUMMARY The issues in these Administration of Massachusetts/Commissioner case are cases whether: a) Commonwealth the acting (Employer), through of the Department ofCorrections (DOC), violated Section 10(a)(3), and, derivatively Section 10(a)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law) by retaliating against Glennis Ogaldez (Ogaldez); (MCOFU Union and b) the Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated or Union) violated
Ogaldez, Administration (Employer), acting through the Department ofCorrection (DOC), violated SUP-12-2282 Section that the Commonwealth 10(a)(3) and, derivatively, Section of Massachusetts/Commissioner 10(a)(1) of M.G.L. c. 150E detaching Ogaldez with pay for engaging in protected concerted activity. (the Law) of by In Case No.
SUPL-12-2283 The Union is the exclusive bargaining representative for correction officers employed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department ofCorrection (DOC) in statewide bargaining unit 4. Stephenson King (King) is the Chief Union Steward at the Boston PreRelease Center (Boston Pre-Release) correctional facility. At all relevant times, King served as the primary Union representative at Boston Pre-Release.
SUP-12-2282 that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts/Commissioner of Administration (Employer), acting through the Department ofCorrection (DOC), violated Section 10(a)(3) and, derivatively, Section 10(a)(1) of M.G.L. c. 150E (the Law) by = io] SUPL-12-2283, Ogaldez alleged that the Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated _ Union (MCOFU or Union) violated Section 10(b)(1) of the Law through statements that = No shop steward Stephenson King (King
STATEMENT OF THE CASE In October 2012 Massachusetts Department ofCorrections (DOC) employee and Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union (MCOFU) member Glennis Ogaldez filed multiple charges of prohibited practice against her employer, the DOC, and her union, MCOFU, at the state Department of Labor Relations.
Department ofCorrection, 16 MCSR 54 (2003), affd sub nom, Pimental v. Civil Service Commn, Suffolk Superior Civ. No. SUCV2003-5908 (June 6, 2005); McDonald v. Boston Public Works, 14 MCSR 60 (2001); Sheehan v. Worcester, 11 MCSR 100 (1998); Brindle v. Taunton, 7 MCSR 112 (1994); Tomasian v. Boston Police Dept, 6 MCSR 221 (1993).
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Commonwealth) is a public employer within the meaning of Section 1 of the Law for all Unit Four correction officers employed at all correctional facilities within its Department ofCorrection. The Commonwealth and MCOFU are parties to a collective bargaining agreement for Unit Four effective from July 1, 2010 through June 20, 2013 covering all such correctional officers. 3.
Department ofCorrection, 19 MCSR 337, 341 (2006): "One would have hoped that this century's workplace had been purged of such offenses ... There is no place for such behavior in the workplace and there is no place for [Mr. Duquette] or others that would engage in such behavior at the Department ofCorrection."
MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & others MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The plaintiffs, Victor Paiva and Scott Finkle, are Lieutenants employed by the Department ofCorrections (DOC). position of Captain at the DOC.
Request by John Mograss, et al. to Investigate the Failure To Administer Civil Service Examinations the Public Safety Position of Captain at the Massachusetts Department ofCorrection, 28 MCSR 601 (2015) (Commission entertained a request for investigation by a group of Lieutenants and Captains of the Department ofCorrection, to determine why no examinations had been held since 1981 for promotion to the civil service position of Captain, which deprived
Department ofCorrection, 25 MCSR 575 (2012); Duquette v. Department of Correction, 19 MCSR 339 (2006); Blais v. Town of Framingham, 20 MCSR 642 (2007). 15 boat holding a can of beer. Specifically, the Respondent averred that this photo appeared to promote irresponsible alcoholic consumption. However, having viewed this photograph, I find that this posting does not promote irresponsible alcoholic consumption.
Department ofCorrection, 28 MCSR 252 (2015). See also PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION RULES, PAR.02. As no candidates ranked below him on the certification were selected, Mr. Duffys appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The parties also dispute whether Mr.
Department ofCorrections, 10 MCSR Health, 19 MCSR 328 639 (2006); 79 (1997); Springer v. Town of Saugus, 8 MCSR 154 (1995). The Commission accepts a Claim of Appeal as timely filed, so long as the appeal is actually received or is postmarked within the prescribed deadline for filing. See 801 CMR 1.00 (4)(b); Town of Falmouth y. Civil Service Commn, 441 Mass. 814, 822-23 (2006).