See also City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 303-305, rev.den., 428 Mass. 1102 (1997); MacHenry v. Civil Service Commn, 40 Mass.App.Ct. 632, 635 (1995), rev.den., 423 Mass. 1106 (1996) The Commission must take account of all credible evidence in the entire administrative record, including whatever would fairly detract from the weight of any particular supporting evidence.

City of Cambridge vs. Civil Service 304 (1997). Reasonable justification means the 43 Mass.App.Ct.300, Commission, Appointing Authoritys actions were based on adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common correct rules of law. sense and by Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex 262 Mass, 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service vs.

He has formerly served as the EMS Coordinator for the city of Cambridge, in this position he supervised the citys paramedics. (Testimony of Appellant) He teaches EMT courses at various hospitals, and established the EMT and continuing education program at MilfordWhitinsville Hospital. (Testimony of Appellant) 16. The Appellant provided EMT training to the Fire Department for at least six years before he became a firefighter.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown y. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); 15 Melsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service 13 Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).

City of Cambridge, 1044, 1050 (1977). 4 MLC Here, the Union argues that it is entitled to summary judgment in its favor concerning Count | of the Complaint either because the City has admitted to the 1 The investigator issued an amended complaint to correct a scriveners error in the original complaint, which also was issued on February 15, 2019. 2 Ruling on Motion for Partial Summary Judgement factual allegations in its answer or the Union documents

The same result also occurred in City of Cambridge, 5 MLC 1291, MUP-2799 (September 27, 1978), where the employer unilaterally terminated free employee parking in city controlled lots and implemented a weekly parking fee; and in Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts, 21 MLC 1795, SUP-3375 (May 12, 1995), where CERB found a violation of the law when the employer unilaterally implemented a 20 percent increase in employee parking fees.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 304 (1997). Reasonable justification means the Appointing Authority's actions were based on adequate reasons supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Civil Service Commn., 61 Mass.App.Ct. 796, 801 (2004) citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 303-305, rev.den., 428 Mass. 1102 (1997). See also, Desmond v. Town of West Bridgewater, 27 MCSR 645 (2014); Ung v. Lowell Police Dept, 24 MCRS 567 (2011); Gallo v. City of Lynn, 23 MCSR 348 (2010). Untruthfulness also may compromise an officers credibility as a witness. See United States v.

City of Cambridge, 23 MLC 28, 36, MUP-9171 (June 28, 1996), affd sub nom., Cambridge Police Superior Officers Association v. Labor Relations Commission, 47 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (1999).