Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is "justified" when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law." Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Collins, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 411 (2000), City of Leominster y. Stratton, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 726, 728 (2003). "The removal of a tenured civil service employee for a lack of funds is an action that the appointing authority may only make with requisite just cause, and that finding of just cause is subject to the Commission's review." LePage v. Department of Mental Retardation, No. D-03416 (2005).

City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). The removal of a tenured civil service employee for a lack of funds is an action that the Appointing Authority may only make with requisite just cause, and that finding of just cause is subject to the Commission's review.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). The Commission has held in numerous decisions that its function is not one of substituting judgment for that of the appointing authority. City of Cambridge, 43 Mass. App. Ct. at 304; School Committee of Salem v. Civil Service Commission, 348 Mass. 696, 699 (1965).

City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an 5 unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. City of Cambridge at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928). Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Murray Supervisor of Records January 6, 2021 SPR20/2540 Katelyn Huffman Leominster City Clerks Office 25 West Street Leominster, MA 01453 Dear Ms. Huffman: I have received the petition of Rob Fasulo appealing the nonresponse of the Leominster City Clerks Office (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Fasulo requested a copy of the active voter roll.

Murray Supervisor of Records December 7, 2021 SPR21/3090 Paula Ouellette Leominster Police Department 29 Church Street Leominster, MA 01453 Dear Ms. Ouellette, I have received the petition of Jordan Rich appealing the nonresponse of the Leominster Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Mr. Rich requested various reports related to a particular car accident.

Fallon Records Access Officer Leominster Police Department 29 Church Street Leominster, MA 01453 Dear Sgt. Fallon: I have received the petition of Blue POV (requestor) appealing the response of the Leominster Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1).

Murray Supervisor of Records March 18, 2022 SPR22/0530 Superintendent Paula Deacon Leominster Public Schools 24 Church Street Leominster, MA 01453 Dear Superintendent Deacon: I have received the petition of Elizabeth Koh of the Boston Globe appealing the nonresponse of the Leominster Public Schools (School) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On February 3, 2022, Ms.