In 2008, the Human ResourcesDivision (hereinafter HRD) administered an examination for the position of Springfield firefighter. Individuals who took and passed the examination, including Mr. Benevento, were placed on an eligible list of candidates established by HRD in December 2008. The eligible list was valid until November 30, 2010. (Investigation) 6. On or about May 20, 2010, Mr. Benevento completed SFDs Recruit Candidate Information Form.
Stein DECISION The Appellant, Max Garfunkel, acting pursuant to G.L.c.31, 2(b), appealed to the Civil Service Commission (Commission) to challenge the decision of the Department of Revenue (DOR) and the Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), to bypass him for provisional promotions to EDP Systems Analyst III (EDP SA-III) and failure to conduct examinations to fill such positions on a permanent basis.
On or about December 1, 2010, an eligibility list for the Firefighter/Paramedic position was established by the Human ResourcesDivision (hereinafter HRD). On or about January 6, 2011, HRD issued Certification number 202996 to the Ludlow Fire Department for three permanent full-time firefighters. Pursuant to a request from the appointing authority, additional names were provided by HRD on or about March 4, 2011.
In such cases, this CD should be used by the plaintiff in the judicial appeal to transcribe the recording into a written transcript. 4 The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts, Human ResourcesDivision, Civil Service Unit, Delegation of Municipal Labor Service, Administrative Manual, which guides municipalities in the correct procedure for promotional appointments, states in Section I that positions requiring no prior experience, such as Laborer, are Class
Michaud: Mark Michaud, Appellant; and taking administrative notice of all matters filed in the case, including, without limitation, documents provided to the Commission by the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) and provided to the parties; pertinent statutes, regulations, policies and case law; and reasonable inferences from the credible evidence; a preponderance of credible evidence establishes the following facts: 1. Mr.
Mulcahy (Mulcahy or Appellant), appealed to the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission (Commission) from the decision of the Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) approving the reasons of the City of Fitchburg, Mayor Lisa Wong (City or Respondent) to bypass him for original appointment as a permanent full-time firefighter for the City of Fitchburg Fire Department (FFD).
evidence at the hearing.3 Based on these exhibits and stipulations in the file, the testimony of the following witnesses: Called by Respondent: Superintendent William Taylor, Lowell Police Department Called by Appellant: Deborah Friedl, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Lowell Police Department; and Daniel Otero, Appellant and taking administrative notice of all matters filed in the case, including, without limitation information provided by the states Human
On February 24, 2010, the state Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) received a Requisition Form 13, dated February 19, 2010, from the Department requesting Certification of eligible candidates from which it may appoint six (6) permanent full-time firefighters. (Ex. 2; Investigation) 9. On April 12, 2010, HRD issued Certification No. 206437 to the Department.
Bowman DECISION On September 30, 2020, the Appellant, Norma Quimby (Appellant), pursuant to G.L. c. 30, 49, filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), contesting the decision of the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), in which HRD affirmed MassDOTs denial of her request to be reclassified from Customer Service Representative II (CSR II) to either Program Coordinator II (PC II) or Customer Service Representative IV (CSR IV).
Ittleman DECISION On January 19, 2018, the Appellant, LaShawnnya Thomas (Appellant), pursuant to G.L. c. 30, 49, filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission), contesting the decision of the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), in which HRD affirmed the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT)s denial of her request to be reclassified from Customer Service Representative III (CSR III) to Program Coordinator III (PC III