City of Cambridge v. Civil Serv. Commn, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997); Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331, 334 (1983). Reasonable justification is established when such an action is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and correct rules of law. Commrs of Civil Serv. v. Mun.

As indicated in City of Cambridge and Cambridge Police Superior Officers Association, MUP-9171 (1996) Applying Commission precedent, we find that, as of September 4, 1991, the Association had acquired information sufficient to constitute actual notice of the City's plan, with the appointment of superintendents and deputy superintendents, to assign | commandingofficer duties to non-bargaining unit personnel.[54] Further, the record demonstrates that

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300,304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).

City of Cambridge, 19 MCSR 299, 303 (2006). The Appellant testified that he should not have been required to perform maintenance work while wearing his full uniform. The Appellant argues that his job description does not state that an Environmental Police Officer J should perform light maintenance. However, the job description does state that a duty of an Environmental Police Officer I is to perform other related work as required.

City of Cambridge v. Baldasaro, 50 Mass. App. Ct. 1, (2000) The second charge is harassment of a sex offender by disseminating information of his sex offender status. However, telling other employees of public information about his offense does not constitute harassment.

City of Cambridge vy, Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). See Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); Melsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); Police Department of Boston v. Collins, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003).

Ct. 796, 801 (2004); citing City of Cambridge, supra at 303. For the reasons cited in the findings, I conclude that the Appellants request to the RMV regarding the private citizens motorcycle registration was retaliatory and hence, not justified.

City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commission, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 300, 304 (1997). The Commission must decide whether HRD had reasonable justification for the action it undertook at the time that it did so. Town of Watertown v. Arria, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 331 (1983); McIsaac v. Civil Service Commission, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 477 (1995); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App.