Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 1111-1120 of 2151 in total
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Gale, Craig v. City of Worcester 9/29/16
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Gales name appeared on the eligible list established by the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD) on November 1, 2014. (Administrative Notice [HRD Letter on File]) 2. On or about September 3, 2015, HRD issued Certification #03219 to Worcester for the appointment of thirty Firefighters. The Certification contained eight names with statutory preference and approximately 110 other names, all of whom claimed Worcester residency preference.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Pereira, Jeffrey v. Springfield Fire Department 4/19/12
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Based on the statement of the parties and the documents submitted by the states Human Resources Division (HRD), the following appears to be undisputed: 1. In April 2008, the Appellant took and passed an examination for the position of firefighter. At the time, the Appellant was living at 89 Sawmill Road in Springfield, MA. 2. In December 2008, HRD established an eligible list of candidates for Springfield firefighter.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Smith, Calvin v. City of Holyoke 7/24/14
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Smiths name was placed on an eligible list of candidates for police officer in Holyoke by the states Human Resources Division (HRD). Said eligible list was established on November 1, 2011. In August 2013, the City requested a Certification to appoint fifteen (15) reserve police officers. On August 2, 2013, HRD sent Certification No. 01035 to the City.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Sexton, Kelly v. Department of Revenue 10/13/16
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Sexton appealed DOR/CSEs determination to the states Human Resources Division (HRD). 4. On October 29, 2015, HRD denied Ms. Sextons appeal and affirmed DOR/CSEs decision to deny her request for reclassification. In the denial letter issued to Ms. Sexton, she was informed of her right to file an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (Commission). 5. On August 25, 2016, the Commission received correspondence from Ms.
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
L. c. 30, 49, to the human resources division (HRD) of the Executive Office for Administration and Finance. In June, 2002, the HRD denied the reclassification requests. (A. 9-10,27) The plaintiffs appealed to the commission in July, 2002, and the appeals were consolidated. (A. 5,6) After discovery and a formal hearing, the commission concluded, in a decision dated September 7, 2006, that 1 Edward Jacobs. 2 Department of Correction.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Centola, Richard v. Boston Police Department 10/22/06
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
Present were the Pro Se Appellant, counsel for the Boston Police Department and the states Human Resources Division (HRD). During the pre-hearing conference, the parties agreed upon the following undisputed facts: 1. The Appellant took the civil service examination for police officer on April 30, 2005 and received a score of 91. 2.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Knox, Michael v. City of Cambridge 11/9/06
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
(emphasis added) The States Human Resources Division (HRD) has promulgated rules relating to promotional appointments as set forth in PAR.19 which states in part, promotional appointmentsshall be made from among the same number of persons with the greatest length of service as the number specified in making appointments under PAR.09, provided that such persons possess the required qualifications and serve in eligible titles, as determined by the administrator
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
The above being said, the Commission reiterates its longstanding admonishment to Appointing Authorities and the Human Resources Division to end the unhealthy and improper reliance on provisional appointments and promotions. See Sullivan v City of Boston, G2-06-48 (2007). Conclusion For the above reasons, the Appellant is not a permanent Civil Service employee and is therefore not entitled to hearing rights under Section 43.
Civil Service Commission Decisions
Rosa, Everett v. City of New Bedford 6/18/20
1 document · · Civil Service Commission ·
The Appellant, Everett Rosa, took and passed the civil service examination for municipal police officer administered on March 23, 2019 by the Massachusetts Human Resources Division (HRD). His name was placed on the eligible list established on September 1, 2019. (Administrative Notice [HRD Letter on File]; Stipulated Facts) 1 2.
2 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Fax Number Human Resources Division, One Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108 6. Employee Organization (if any): 7, Representative to contact Alliance/AFSCME/SEIU, Local 509 8. . 9. Telephone Number James Hykel, Esq. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) Pyle Rome Ehrenberg PC, 2 Liberty Square, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02109 617-727-1477 617-367-7200 : 410.
Displaying items 1111-1120 of 2151 in total