DOCs normal practice, which appears to be consistent with the delegation agreement between DOC and the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD), is to offer candidates conditional offers of employment subject to successful completion of such medical-related screening including drug screening and a psychological evaluation.
The Appellants name appeared within the 53rd tie group on Certification No.05612 issued to New Bedford by the Massachusetts Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) for appointment of full-time police officers to fill vacancies in the NBPD. 2. New Bedford appointed a total of thirty (30) candidates from Certification No. 05612, including, several candidates from the 53rd tie group. 3.
Firm/Organization Name Commonwealth Human ResourcesDivision EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (if any) 17. Name National Association of Government Employees 18. Telephone Number 617-376-0220 | 19,20,21,22. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 23. FAX Number 159 Burgin Parkway Quincy MA 02169 7 _ 617-376-0285 _ / EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION'S LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 24. Name Lawrence D. Humphrey oe | 25.
On March 26, 2024, I held a remote show cause conference which was attended by counsel for the Petitioners, co-counsel for the BFD, and counsel for the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD); a representative from the BFD administration; and two members of the public. As part of their petition, the Petitioners identified what they considered to be a vacancy which, at the time of the petition, was located at Engine 53.
On March 22, 2022, the Human ResourcesDivision established a certification list. The Gloucester fire chief relies on the Gloucester Police Department to conduct background investigations of applicants for fire department positions. The investigation of Mr. DeFarias was assigned to Lieutenant Williams who was assisted by Detective Trefry.
Henderson DECISION Pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 31, s. 2(b), the Appellant, Sean Connolly (hereinafter the Appellant or Connolly) seeks review of the Human ResourcesDivisions (HRD) decision in accepting reasons proffered by the Respondent-Appointing Authority, Boston Police Department (hereafter the Department, Appointing Authority or BPD), for the bypass of the Appellant for original appointment to the position of Boston police officer.
BBO# 705695 AFSCME Council 93 8 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108 617-367-6027 jmurphy@afscme93.org 8 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that on this day of September }1, 2022, I hereby caused a true and complete copy of the foregoing Request for Review to be forwarded by electronic mail to Jennifer Kelly, Esq. for the Human ResourcesDivision. 9
Human ResourcesDivision 100 Cambridge Street Boston, MA 02114 Re: SUP-22-9097, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and AFSCME Council 93, AFL-CIO Dear Mr. Murphy and Ms. Kelly: AFSCME Council 93 (Union) appeals from the dismissal of the above-referenced charge of prohibited practice. The charge was filed with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR) on February 1, 2022.
Kelly__________________ Labor Counsel Human ResourcesDivision 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 Jennifer.kelly@mass.gov Date: August 11, 2022 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on August 11, 2022, I provided a copy of this response and all attachments to Union Counsel, Justin Murphy, Esq., by email. /s/ Jennifer N. Kelly_______________ 9
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Human ResourcesDivision 100 Cambridge Street Boston, MA 02114 Re: SUP-22-9097, AFSCME, Council 93, Local 1114 Dear Mr. Murphy and Ms.
(emphasis added) The States Human ResourcesDivision (HRD) has promulgated rules relating to promotional appointments as set forth in PAR.19 which states in part, promotional appointmentsshall be made from among the same number of persons with the greatest length of service as the number specified in making appointments under PAR.09, provided that such persons possess the required qualifications and serve in eligible titles, as determined by the administrator
Deputy General Counsel Human ResourcesDivision One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 DECISION ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION The Appellant, Matthew J. Grealish appealed a decision of the Registry of Motor Vehicles (RMV) that declined to appoint him provisionally to the position of Driver License Examiner. Mr. Grealish asserted that the RMV failed to provide him a statutory preference, to which he was entitled as a veteran, under G.L.c.31, 26.
Sean Layton and Ryan Layton took and passed a civil service examination for the position of firefighter that was administered by the states Human ResourcesDivision (HRD). Based on their assertions at the time of the examination that they satisfied the residency requirement (resided in Somerville at least one year prior to the date of the examination), HRD placed their names on an eligible list of candidates with a residency preference.