Town of Middleborough, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 427 (2000) (in a non-premium context, arbitrator had no authority to order the town to continue payments for certain health benefits that were not in accordance with the law). 15 essentially acted under the law and was thus obligated to continue them. "The simple fact is that all contributions by the city in excess of 50% have been in violation of the statute." 3 80 Mass. at 127.

Town of Middleborough, Superior Court, Civ Ac. # 09-1379 (notice of appeal filed pursuant to Mass. R. App. P.) Wrentham deals only with the role of town meeting in setting subsidiary rates for active employees, not retirees.

Town of Middleborough, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 427 (2000) (in a non-premium context, arbitrator had no authority to order the town to continue payments for certain health benefits that were not in accordance with the law). 15 essentially acted under the law and was thus obligated to continue them. The simple fact is that all contributions by the city in excess of 50% have been in violation of the statute. 380 Mass. at 127.

Town of Middleborough, Superior Court, Civ Ac. # 09-1379 (notice of appeal filed pursuant to Mass. R. App. P.) Wrentham deals only with the role of town meeting in setting subsidiary rates for active employees, not retirees.

Town of Middleborough, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 427 (2000) (in a non-premium context, arbitrator had no authority to order the town to continue payments for certain health benefits that were not in accordance with the law). 15 essentially acted under the law and was thus obligated to continue them. The simple fact is that all contributions by the city in excess of 50% have been in violation of the statute. 380 Mass. at 127.

Town of Middleborough, Superior Court, Civ Ac. # 09-1379 (notice of appeal filed pursuant to Mass. R. App. P.) Wrentham deals only with the role of town meeting in setting subsidiary rates for active employees, not retirees.

Town of Middleborough, 24 MCSR 352 (2011), citing City of Cambridge v. Civil Service Commn, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 300, 303-305, rev.den., 428 Mass. 1102 (1997) (The city was hardly espousing a position devoid of reason when it held that a demonstrated willingness to fudge the truth in exigent circumstances was a doubtful characteristic. . . . It requires no strength of character to speak the truth when it does not hurt.) See also Town of Randolph v.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts and in a community from the following list: Abington, Avon, Braintree, Bridgewater, Brockton, Canton, Carver, Cohasset, Duxbury, East Bridgewater, Halifax, Hanson, Hingham, Holbrook, Hull, Kingston, Marshfield, Middleboro, Milton, Norwell, Pembroke, Plymouth, Plympton, Quincy, Randolph, Rockland, Scituate, Stoughton, West Bridgewater, the portion of the Town of Wareham that lies within one mile of the shared border with the Town

Commonwealth of Massachusetts and in a community from the following list: Abington, Avon, Braintree, Bridgewater, Brockton, Canton, Carver, Cohasset, Duxbury, East Bridgewater, Halifax, Hanson, Hingham, Holbrook, Hull, Kingston, Marshfield, Middleboro, Milton, Norwell, Pembroke, Plymouth, Plympton, Quincy, Randolph, Rockland, Scituate, Stoughton, West Bridgewater, the portion of the Town of Wareham that lies within one mile of the shared border with the Town

Commonwealth of Massachusetts and in a community from the following list: Abington, Avon, Braintree, Bridgewater, Brockton, Canton, Carver, Cohasset, Duxbury, East Bridgewater, Halifax, Hanson, Hingham, Holbrook, Hull, Kingston, Marshfield, Middleboro, Milton, Norwell, Pembroke, Plymouth, Plympton, Quincy, Randolph, Rockland, Scituate, Stoughton, West Bridgewater, the portion of the Town of Wareham that lies within one mile of the shared border with the Town

Town of Middleborough, 24 MCSR 352 (2011) and cases cited; Gallo v. City of Lynn, 23 MCSR 348 (2010) An officers demonstrated record of untruthfulness may compromise the officers ability to serve as a credible witness in the prosecution of a criminal case. See generally, United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 108, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2400 (1976), citing Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194 (1963). See also Kyles v.

MA 02021 Middleborough, MA 02346 massasolt.edu RP 508-568-9100 EXHIBIT 10.06 A. Step Three - Arbitration Within forty (40) calendar days after mediation has been concluded in accordance with 10.05.G.2, arbitration of a grievance may be initiated in accordance with the following provisions: 1. 2. 3. 4. The Association shall have the exclusive right to initiate arbitration of a grievance.

TC: Personnel File Note: Original Delivered in Hand: November 1, 2019 Breckton Canton One Massasoit Boulevard Middleborough 900 Randolph Street 49 Union Street Brockton, MA 02302 Canton, MA 62021 Middleborough, MA 02346 massasolt.ecu p 508-586-9100 EXHIBIT /{ 09-01 12:09:00 p.m. 508 427 1252 4030) Yysi3uz JOIN SIHEWAYIEW J0INE SAREWAINE JOIN | SIHEWBYICW 4OUNL SIHEWAYIEW 6102 38q pied 3st - JojnL Ystsuy UolUN-VON] UOIUN-UON] UOIUN-UON| UOIUN-UON|

Boston School Committee, 35 MLC 277, 285-86 (2009); Town of Lenox, 29 MLC 51, 52 (2002) (citing Wakefield School Committee, 27 MLC 9, 10 (2000)); Town of Middleborough, 18 MLC 1409 (1992) In this case, six months following the September 2, 2014 letter to Hiett is March 2, 2015. As the party adversely affected, Hiett had actual notice of the Citys decision not to reemploy him on or about September 2, 2014.'