. == SSC PAGEL NTY; AND MUNICIPAL "EMPLOYEES, AFL- ClO, COUNCIL 93, LOCAL 2747 _ ee ARTICLE 1 INTENT AND PURPOSE The general intent and purpose of this agreement is that iti is in the mutual interests of the School Committee and the Union to provide: for the. operation of our schools under methods which will further to the fullest extent possibly - the safety, welfare, and health of the School children of the Town ofBillerica under the conditions
Tewksbury; (2) Town of Chelmsford Collective Bargaining History for following units: clerical employees, cemetery, dispatchers, facilities, firefighters, public works and library; (3) Longevity comparison for all Town units; (4) EMT incentive for firefighters, police patrol officers and police superior officers; (5) Patrol officers compensation comparisons as of July 1, 2015 for Chelmsford, Billerica, Dracut and Tewksbury; (6) Agreement between Town
Tewksbury; (2) Town of Chelmsford Collective Bargaining History for following units: clerical employees, cemetery, dispatchers, facilities, firefighters, public works and library; (3) Longevity comparison for all Town units; (4) EMT incentive for firefighters, police patrol officers and police superior officers; (5) Patrol officers compensation comparisons as of July 1, 2015 for Chelmsford, Billerica, Dracut and Tewksbury; (6) Agreement between Town
In assessing comparable data, both parties indicated that the TownsofBillerica, Reading, Tewksbury, and Wilmington were appropriate comparable communities to help the parties evaluate and determine appropriate salaries and other outstanding issues for the police in Chelmsford. (The Town also thought Dracut was a comparable community.)
Tewksbury; (2) Town of Chelmsford Collective Bargaining History for following units: clerical employees, cemetery, dispatchers, facilities, firefighters, public works and library; (3) Longevity comparison for all Town units; (4) EMT incentive for firefighters, police patrol officers and police superior officers; (5) Patrol officers compensation comparisons as of July 1, 2015 for Chelmsford, Billerica, Dracut and Tewksbury; (6) Agreement between Town
The Panel notes that in the 2016 firefighters award the parties agreed that the TownsofBillerica, Reading, Tewksbury, and Wilmington were appropriate comparable communities.8 In the 2018 patrol officers award, that Panel determined the Townsof Billerica, Reading, Tewksbury, and Wilmington were appropriate comparable 8 That panel noted that the Town also thought Dracut was comparable, but determined not to include it in the universe of comparables
It passed her town council in Billerica , MA. last week ) Respectfully submitted , Sarah P Ahern 8 'Sarah Ahern' via Town Council to Mayor, Loreen, towncouncil@greenfield-ma.gov Dear Sirs and Madams Please accept a formal draft of the proclamation referenced in an earlelr email . I thank everybody in advance for the show of support on this initiative .
Paolucci Clerk | Records Division Billerica Police Department 6 Good St Billerica, MA 01821 Direct Phone: 978-215-9647 Agency Phone: 978-671-0900 Fax: 978-663-2392 Website: https://police.billericaps.com This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
G2-18-079 TOWN OFBILLERICA, Respondent Appearance for Appellant: Joseph Sulman, Esq. 391 Totten Pond Rd., Suite 402 Waltham, MA 02451 Appearance for Respondent: Daniel C. Brown, Esq. Feeley & Brown, P.C. 1600 Boston-Providence Hwy., Suite 209A Walpole, MA 02081 Commissioner: Christopher C. Bowman DECISION On May 8, 2018, Jason Smith (Lt.
.: G2-09-332 TOWN OFBILLERICA, Respondent ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE The Appellant, who holds the civil service title of working foreman, filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission contesting the Town ofBillericas decision to designate Everett Crotty as Acting Cemetery, Tree and Parks Superintendent.
No. 2019-00176 Paper 13, filed by Town ofBillerica Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings The Town of Billerica (Town) appeals from a decision of the Civil Service Commission (the commission) and therefore bears the burden of proving that the decision is invalid. Police Dept of Boston v. Kavaleski, 463 Mass. 680, 689 (2012).