Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is "justified" when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law." Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

See City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 727 (2003). While it is true that the BPD was incorrect in its assertion that Rodrigues was ineligible to re-enlist in the Marine Corps, the BPDs othet reasons for bypassing him withstood the Commissions review.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is 5 justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Cambridge at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon 1 adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

City of Leominster v. Warden L. Stratton et al., 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). Section 44 provides that the judicial review be conducted conformably as prescribed in G.L. c, 30A, 14.

See e.g., City of Leominster and International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Local 338, 8 MLC 2034, 2036 (1982) (Commission rejected Citys argument that Commissions derivative 10(a)(1) complaint allegation should be denied on the grounds that, other than evidence presented on the underlying 10(a)(5) complaint allegations, no evidence was presented at hearing that union members were interfered with, restrained, and coerced in violation of 10(a)(1

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is "justified" when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law." Id. at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). An action is justified when it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence when weighed by an unprejudiced mind; guided by common sense and by correct rules of law. City of Cambridge, at 304, quoting Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First Dist. Ct. of E. Middlesex, 262 Mass. 477, 482 (1928); Commissioners of Civil Service v.

Ct. 411 (2000); City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). Discipline is justified if it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighted by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and correct rules of law. Sullivan v. Municipal Court of Roxbury District, 342 Mass. 612 (1948), Police Commr of Boston v.

Ct. 411 (2000), City of Leominster v. Stratton, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 726, 728 (2003). Discipline is Sustified if it is done upon adequate reasons sufficiently supported by credible evidence, when weighted by an unprejudiced mind, guided by common sense and correct rules of Jaw. Sullivan v. Municipal Court of Roxbury District, 342 Mass. 612 (1948), Police Commr of Boston v.