Boston Housing Authority v National conference of Firemen and Oilers, Local 3, 458 Mass. 155 (2010). See also, Town of Watertown v. Watertown Municipal Employees Assn, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 285, 289 (2005) and Old Rochester Regional Teachers Club v Old Rochester Regional Sch. Dist Com., 398 Mass. 695 699 (1986), (citing Nolde Bros.

Analysis of the Boston Housing Authority decision The instant contract expired June 30, 2009. The complained of conduct commenced Aug. 17, 2009. Boston Housing Authority v. National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, Local 3, 458 Mass. 155 makes it clear that collective bargaining agreements (hereafter CBA) expire, in their entirety, after a three year period: As we have stated the MOA expired according to its fixed term on March 31, 2004.

Boston Housing Authority v. National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, Local 3 , 458 Mass. 155 (2010) stands for the proposition that upon the commencement of the 37" month following its effective date, any contract governed by M.G.L. c. 150E ceases to be in full force and effect in its entirety.

The Agreement Boston Housing Authority v. National Local 3, 458 Mass. 155 (2010) (BHA), the that the Agreement expired at end and Oilers Officer of its fixed the Agreement in full negotiations for a the Citys Friday concluded three-year closures involving rights.

Ct. 9 (1991); Boston Housing Authority., 11 MLC 1195 n.11 (1984); and City of Quincy, 15 MLC 1340, 1368 (1989). 1189, Accordingly, these claims should be dismissed outright, as Ms. Aung can plead no set of facts as an individual to establish that the Respondent violated these provisions of the Law.

Boston Housing Authority, 24 MCSR 193 (2011), Clark v. Boston Housing Authority, Suffolk Superior Court, C.A. No. SUCV2011- 2554E, affd (Feb. 13, 2015). Where the opposing party has established a case adverse to the party invoking the privilege, the invoking party should be subject to a negative inference by the Commission. Town of Falmouth v. Civil Serv. Commn, 447 Mass. 814, 826-27 (2006); See also Gould v.

HALLORAN THE BOSTON POLICE RELIEF ASSOCIATION MEMORIAL AW ARD Police Officer Christopher Kennedy Police Officer Carl Nemes #116945 #131198 Youth Violence Strike Force District B-3 POLICE COMMISSIONER'S SPECIAL CITATION Police Officer Charles Keller Boston Housing Authority Police On January 25, 2019, Police Officers Christopher Kennedy and Carl Nemes, while assigned to Area B-3, along with Police Officer Charles Keller, assigned to the Boston Housing

On October 22, 2010, the Supreme Judicial Court in Boston Housing Authority v.

Coutts was assigned to the Boston Housing Authority Police Department, as an armed police officer, where she patrolled the Citys housing developments. (Testimony of Appellant). 10. On November 11, 2007 Ms. Coutts was appointed to the Needham Police Department where she serves as a police officer assigned to the midnight shift. Ms. Coutts is a full-time officer who patrols Needham in a marked police car and is armed. (Testimony of Appellant). 11.

Boston Housing Authority, 24 MCSR 193 (2011), Clark v. Boston Housing Authority, Suffolk Superior Court, C.A. No. SUCV2011-2554E, affd (Feb. 13, 2015).

At the time of the Commission hearing, the Appellant was a police officer for the Boston Housing Authority (BHA), where he had been working for five (5) years. Prior to working at the Boston Housing, the Appellant was a police officer at Boston College for approximately five (5) years. (Testimony of Appellant; Joint Exhibit (J.Ex.) 1) All told, the Appellant has been a law enforcement officer for at least ten (10) years. (Id.)

See Boston Housing Authority v. Nat'l. Conference of Firemen and Oilers, Local 3, 453 Mass. 155 (2010); G.L. c. 150E, 7A as amended by st. 2010 c. 198, 1.