1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission denied the City's motion to dismiss, concluding that the Appellant was entitled to file a bypass appeal after the revoked his conditional offer of employment based on new information after he was enrolled in the Police Academy.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission allowed the bypass appeal of the Appellant because the City failed to show that it completed a fair, impartial and sufficiently thorough review of her candidacy, and the preponderance of the evidence did not support the reasons cited for bypass.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Superior Court affirmed the Commission's decision to uphold the City of Somerville's decision to bypass the Appellant for promotional appointment to police lieutenant.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission denied the bypass appeal of a candidate seeking appointment as a police officer, concluding that the City of Brockton had reasonable justification to bypass him based upon inconsistent responses about his residency history during the application process and the omission of prior employment attempts.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's examination appeal as he failed to follow the instructions to complete his ECT&E appeal online in a timely manner.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission upheld HRD’s scoring of the Appellant’s Experience, Certification, Training and Education (ECT&E) component of the Statewide Deputy Fire Chief’s Examination as “incomplete” because the Appellant failed to comply with the instructions for timely submission of the ECT&E on-line claim form.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission upheld HRD’s decision that the Appellant was ineligible to take the September 2023 readministered Statewide Police Sergeant Promotional Exam because he had not been employed as a Cambridge police officer at least three years prior to November 2022.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the appeal of the Appellant for lack of jurisdiction as the Appellant is unable to show that has been harmed as his appeal relies on speculation regarding a potential future appointment and the appeal relates to a contract seniority date, as opposed to a civil service seniority date.