1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Appellant’s Section 42 procedural appeal is dismissed as he was unable to show that he was prejudiced by the City’s short delay in conducting a local hearing to contest his five-day suspension. His separate appeal, in which he is contesting whether there was just cause for the suspension, is going forward.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant’s promotional examination appeal as the civil service law expressly provides that HRD’s determination on the grading of multiple-choice questions is final and the Commission is not vested with jurisdiction to hear an appeal from such a determination.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission denied the Petitioner’s request for investigation as it appears that she is seeking a reclassification and has failed to file a formal request for a reclassification with her appointing authority.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission declined the Petitioner's request to investigate alleged irregularities regarding a recent promotional examination as it involves issues already reviewed by the Commission or can be addressed as part of an appeal the Petitioner has pending before the Commission.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant’s appeal after determining that the Appellant raises no issue—nor does he seek relief—that is not, or could not have been, asserted within the scope of his pending disciplinary appeal (filed with the Commission in August 2022) or his federal lawsuit currently scheduled for trial.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's appeal as he was not bypassed for promotion, was not aggrieved as defined by the civil service law and issues related to the promotional process are being addressed through a separate bypass appeal.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission accepted the recommendation of a DALA Magistrate to affirm the Boston Police Department's decision to terminate the Appellant for untruthfulness, including the filing of false charges against a Police Captain.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed this discipline appeal based on a lack of jurisdiction as an appeal regarding the same matter was filed with an arbitrator.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Although it is an unfortunate outcome for the Appellant, the Commission dismissed his appeal as he was unable to show that he is an aggrieved person based on his failure to check his spam email account and open a notification telling him that his name appeared on a certification for Somerville firefighter.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Appellant filed an appeal contesting the decision of the Lowell PD to bypass him for Police Lieutenant. As the Appellant has complaint pending with MCAD, this appeal was dismissed until that matter is resolved.