1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Bypass appeal for original appointment as a police officer denied. The Appellant's poor interview performance provided the City of Quincy with reasonable justification to bypass him for appointment.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Bypass appeal for fire alarm operator denied. The Appellant was not in compliance with the Department's policies regarding visible tattoos.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The City of Brockton had reasonable justification to bypass the Appellant based on his inability to comply with the Police Department's tattoo policy.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Bypass appeal for original appointment as a firefighter allowed. Personal bias was a factor in the appointment process, warranting relief by the Commission.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Bypass appeal for original appointment as a Correction Officer I denied. Appellant's two prior OUIs, one which involved unlawful possession of a loaded firearm, provided the Department of Correction with reasonable justification to bypass him for appointment.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Examination appeal related to education and experience denied. HRD's decision not to award police officer credit for time spent in the Coast Guard was not arbitrary or capricious.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Education and Experience examination appeal denied. Appellant was unable to show that she completed instructions for the E&E portion of the examination.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
After a thorough investigation, the Commission concluded that a Holyoke firefighter's appointment was invalid based on his failure to show that he met the statutory residency preference requirements. Remedial orders issued.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Clarification of relief to be ordered based on updated information provided by the City of Holyoke regarding the aggrieved person.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission voted to initiate an investigation regarding whether the City's decision to not participate in upcoming promotional examination was contrary to basic merit principles.