1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission allowed the Appellant’s bypass appeal, concluding that the Appellant’s few, minor discrepancies in the documentation submitted with his application did not provide the Town of Auburn reasonable justification to bypass the Appellant for original appointment as a permanent full-time police officer.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant's appeal as moot after concluding that he had received proper credit for his college degree as part of a recent promotional examination for Boston Fire Lieutenant.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Consistent with prior decisions, the Commission denied the Appellant' request to investigate HRD's decision to limit eligibility for a re-scheduled police promotional examination to only those candidates who had registered for the examination administered (but not scored) last year, as HRD's decision was not arbitrary
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission allowed the Appellant's appeal, concluding that he was aggrieved by an HRD decision not to restore him to an eligible list for promotion upon his reinstatement.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission allowed the Appellant's appeal, concluding that he was aggrieved by an HRD decision not to restore him to an eligible list for promotion upon his reinstatement.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission denied the Appellant’s bypass appeal, concluding that the Boston Police Department had reasonable justification to bypass the Appellant for original appointment as a permanent full-time police officer due to his criminal record and numerous driving infractions and violations.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission allowed the request of the Malden Police Department to revive the revoked eligible list for Police Lieutenant after concluding that doing so is consistent with the effective maintenance of the merit system.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Appellant’s Section 42 procedural appeal is dismissed as he was unable to show that he was prejudiced by the City’s short delay in conducting a local hearing to contest his five-day suspension. His separate appeal, in which he is contesting whether there was just cause for the suspension, is going forward.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant’s promotional examination appeal as the civil service law expressly provides that HRD’s determination on the grading of multiple-choice questions is final and the Commission is not vested with jurisdiction to hear an appeal from such a determination.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission denied the Petitioner’s request for investigation as it appears that she is seeking a reclassification and has failed to file a formal request for a reclassification with her appointing authority.