1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Promotional examination appeals denied as Appellants failed to file a fair test appeal with HRD with seven days of the examination. HRD encouraged to review process for advising applicants of appeal rights.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Other Appeal dated April 18, 2012 Linehan, Richard v. City of Brockton, Human Resources Division, WIllisam Hallisey and David Dickinson - Procedural Order 4/18/12
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the appeal of the Appellant regarding a 5 and 10-day suspension for failure to comply with the vaccination mandate in place at the time as the Appellant failed to file a timely appeal with the Commission.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission affirmed the decision of the Town to suspend the Appellant for 15 days for neglect of duty, including his failure to act promptly regarding a violation of a restraining order and alleged excessive force.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission denied the Appellant's appeal as he was unable to show that HRD failed to credit him with all points due to him for time served in the Weymouth Fire Department, where he is seeking to be promoted to Deputy Fire Chief.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
Relying on prior Commission decisions , a majority of the Commission denied the Appellants' request to overrule HRD's decision to limit participation in re-administered police promotional examinations to those who sat for the initial examinations in 2022.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission denied the Appellant’s bypass appeal, concluding that the Boston Police Department had reasonable justification to bypass the Appellant for original appointment as a permanent full-time police officer due to his criminal record and numerous driving infractions and violations.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission allowed the request of the Malden Police Department to revive the revoked eligible list for Police Lieutenant after concluding that doing so is consistent with the effective maintenance of the merit system.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Appellant’s Section 42 procedural appeal is dismissed as he was unable to show that he was prejudiced by the City’s short delay in conducting a local hearing to contest his five-day suspension. His separate appeal, in which he is contesting whether there was just cause for the suspension, is going forward.
1 document · ·Civil Service Commission ·
The Commission dismissed the Appellant’s promotional examination appeal as the civil service law expressly provides that HRD’s determination on the grading of multiple-choice questions is final and the Commission is not vested with jurisdiction to hear an appeal from such a determination.