Driscoll, Daniel v. Department of Conservation and Recreation 10/20/22

The Commission denied the Appellant's appeal as he was unable to show that he performs the duties of a Civil Engineer VI a majority of the time.

This record is part of the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission Decisions collection.

Agency: Civil Service Commission
Appeal Type: Classification Appeal
Summary: The Commission denied the Appellant's appeal as he was unable to show that he performs the duties of a Civil Engineer VI a majority of the time.

Documents

driscoll-daniel-v-department-of-conservation-and-recreation-102022.pdf

Original Source

This record was sourced from the website of the Civil Service Commission. All decisions of the commission from 2006 to present are available on that site.

/items/ma_csc_decisions/driscoll-daniel-v-department-of-conservation-and-recreation-102022/attachments/driscoll-daniel-v-department-of-conservation-and-recreation-102022.pdf

Driscoll, Daniel v. Department of Conservation and Recreation 10/20/22

The Commission denied the Appellant's appeal as he was unable to show that he performs the duties of a Civil Engineer VI a majority of the time.

This record is part of the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission Decisions collection.

Agency: Civil Service Commission
Appeal Type: Classification Appeal
Summary: The Commission denied the Appellant's appeal as he was unable to show that he performs the duties of a Civil Engineer VI a majority of the time.

Documents

driscoll-daniel-v-department-of-conservation-and-recreation-102022.pdf

Original Source

This record was sourced from the website of the Civil Service Commission. All decisions of the commission from 2006 to present are available on that site.