Derksen Page 5 June 27, 2023 SPR23/1256 With respect to records request 1, 2, and 5, these requested records are the subjects of a disputeinactivelitigation. See Hovsepian, Scott et al. v. Massachusetts Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission (Suffolk Superior Court Docket No.2284CV00906). In light of the pending litigation, I decline to opine on the portions of the requests numbered 1, 2 and 5 at this time.
and/or officers and/or employees of the police department between the dates of May 1, 2022 and April 14, 2023 that make reference to and/or cite, in whole or in part, the following sentences (as they appear in said records, designated with quotation marks (example: Public Records), broadly construed. the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) the responsive records in question are the subjects of dispute
See, e.g., SPR19/102 (Whereas the requested records are the subject of disputeinactive litigation, and in particular the subject of a discovery request, I decline to opine on this matter.).
See, e.g., SPR19/102 (Whereas the requested records are the subject of disputeinactive litigation, and in particular the subject of a discovery request, I decline to opine on this matter.). Moreover, upon information and belief, Bruce Friedman has also created a new email and has submitted further public records requests to Malden using the email address, ...@publicschoolsdata.com. By using a separate email address, Mr.
See, e.g., SPR19/102 (Whereas the requested records are the subject of disputeinactive litigation, and in particular the subject of a discovery request, I decline to opine on this matter.). Moreover, upon information and belief, Bruce Friedman has also created a new email and has submitted further public records requests to Malden using the email address, data@publicschoolsdata.com. By using a separate email address, Mr.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. | support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovespian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. | support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.