Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Employee Organization Individual Employer @ 39. The Charging Party Is an: @ 40. Name @ 41.
Srednicki: The Charging Party, University Staff Association/MTA/NEA, respectfully requests a brief extension of time to allow for execution of a mutually agreed-upon settlement agreement regarding the above-captioned matter. The Respondent, University of Massachusetts, assent to this request. . Thank you. Sincerely, fe - Jacqueline R. Hirtle Assistant to Attorney Ali 236518 cc: Brian Harrington, Esq.
After reaching a settlement mediated by DLR, the Union unilaterally rejected and repudiated the accepted basis for the additional compensation, have refused to release the employer from any further liability pursuant to the "new equipment" clause, and, now claim that they can separately pursue relief against the employer for the multi-million dollar upgrade of the water treatment plant pursuant to the "new equipment" clause in the CBA. 36.
L] No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(7). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Joseph DeLorey 617-367-6035 AFSCME Council 93 19.
LJ Yes No The conduct complained of included public comments, making settlement fruitless. Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20.
On October 19, 20920 counsel for the union responded to counsel for the Sheriff's Office: "Both 2 ry for historical purposes and to facilitate a favorable ratification vote on the contract settlement, we will need a signed MOA in the form attached. Please let me know if you have any questions. We are reviewing your draft of the integrated contract and assuming ratification, which we expect, | will get back to you with the results of our review."
WUSt/N Printed Name Js] ie Date HAA KARR K AKA ERK EKA KKK AKA EE EE EEF) ) ) ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 93 ) ) and ) ) ) PAUL AUSTIN as an individual SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case # 3-215/C-011-15 Paul Austin (ID# 010904) ) ) ) and ) CITY OF BOSTON, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 246 2K oie ae 2 2 he ie oie ie 9 A oe i RK eR ee oe ) ) ) KR KKK KKK In full and final settlement of the above referenced case, the City
Include the whe No they agreed ae settlement efforts have been made by 15.04/71). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 6UNG 19. 22. 18. Representative to contact KR. 20. Telephone Number AvuST iin Gh SET GOP SAE Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) - 21.
MA.US> Cc: Melissa Thomson Subject: SUP 17 5788 Hi Kathleen, Union has signed settlement. Er getting signatory today. We dont anticipate being there tomorrow. | will withdraw as soon as | get executed doc, which | anticipate will be this afternoon. Joe D General Counsel AFSCME Council 93 Legal Dept. 8 Beacon St.
Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04 (1) INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name 19. Representative to contact Alliance/AFSCME Atty. Joseph DeLorey 20. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 8 Beacon St., Boston, MA 02108 23. The Charging Party is an : ["] Individual 21. Telephone Number 617 367 6035 22.
. - Negotiations, proposals, and settlement discussions with Northeastern University. [2] The decision to use the Towns legal standing and voluntarily join an existing private lawsuit requiring the defense of Nahant Preservation Trust and 27 named individuals. [3] The formulation of the Eminent Domain article and related legal strategies, including: - Justifications for pursuing eminent domain. - Risk assessments and legal advisories. - Any influence
Soldiers Home management asserted their contractual rights stating that if the Union 7 At the hearing, the Union submitted a copy of its settlement agreement with the Employer. According to the settlement, the parties specifically agree[d] to meet in good faith and negotiate the parameters of a [g]lobal [rje-bid at the Chelsea Soldiers Home.
The Charging Party focused her questioning of Attorney Magner on why the polling was not mentioned in the settlement agreement. However, as Attorney Magner explained the polling was a verbal condition precedent set by the Commonwealth. John Magner. Testimony of The settlement agreement states the parties would negotiate the parameters of the global re-bid. Respondent Exhibit 5.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. settlement. 2.
In or around April 2017, before the Employer conducted a new global re-bid, the Union polled bargaining unit members to determine whether they wanted to participate in the new global re-bid process that resulted from the settlement of Case No. SUP-17-5717. 19. At a membership meeting on April 27, 2017, a majority of bargaining members voted against participating in a new global re-bid process. 20.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.