WUSt/N Printed Name Js] ie Date HAA KARR K AKA ERK EKA KKK AKA EE EE EEF) ) ) ) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 93 ) ) and ) ) ) PAUL AUSTIN as an individual SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case # 3-215/C-011-15 Paul Austin (ID# 010904) ) ) ) and ) CITY OF BOSTON, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 246 2K oie ae 2 2 he ie oie ie 9 A oe i RK eR ee oe ) ) ) KR KKK KKK In full and final settlement of the above referenced case, the City
Include the whe No they agreed ae settlement efforts have been made by 15.04/71). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 6UNG 19. 22. 18. Representative to contact KR. 20. Telephone Number AvuST iin Gh SET GOP SAE Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) - 21.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Employee Organization Individual Employer @ 39. The Charging Party Is an: @ 40. Name @ 41.
Srednicki: The Charging Party, University Staff Association/MTA/NEA, respectfully requests a brief extension of time to allow for execution of a mutually agreed-upon settlement agreement regarding the above-captioned matter. The Respondent, University of Massachusetts, assent to this request. . Thank you. Sincerely, fe - Jacqueline R. Hirtle Assistant to Attorney Ali 236518 cc: Brian Harrington, Esq.
MA.US> Cc: Melissa Thomson Subject: SUP 17 5788 Hi Kathleen, Union has signed settlement. Er getting signatory today. We dont anticipate being there tomorrow. | will withdraw as soon as | get executed doc, which | anticipate will be this afternoon. Joe D General Counsel AFSCME Council 93 Legal Dept. 8 Beacon St.
Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04 (1) INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name 19. Representative to contact Alliance/AFSCME Atty. Joseph DeLorey 20. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 8 Beacon St., Boston, MA 02108 23. The Charging Party is an : ["] Individual 21. Telephone Number 617 367 6035 22.
Kelley, Gwenn (EOL) From: Sent: Leigh Panettiere Monday, June 05, 2017 7:40 PM To: Imaki@braintreema.gov; Efile DLR (EOL) Subject: Town of Braintree - MUP-17-5902 Notice of In-Person Investigation SETTLEMENT/WITHDRAWAL OF CHARGE Dear Mr. Srednicki The parties have reached a settlement of this matter. The Union hereby withdraws the charge. person investigation scheduled for tomorrow morning at 10:00 be cancelled.
Yes L | No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging partly. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Leigh Panettiere 617-523-2500 Braintree Police Officer's Assoc. MCOP 19. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 44 School St., Suite 22. 1100, Boston, MA 21.
October 20, 2016, On the Federation and the Employer entered into a Settlement Agreement, hereinafter S/A, (Exhibit B) to resolve a grievance filed by the Federation on July 27, 2016. agreed: As part of that S/A the Employer "4, Pittsfield agrees that members of the Paraprofessional unit are not required to resign from their bargaining unit position in order to apply for other vacancies or to request a transfer to another position withing the bargaining
The Respondent admits that it entered into a settlement agreement with the Charging Party as detailed in the Charge. 3. The Respondent denies that it required McKinney to resign from her position in order to transfer to another position. CONCLUSION The Respondent submits that the allegation is not accurate, and that it did not violate the law in regard to the allegation contained in the Charge.
Over the following months, Town Manager Peter Frohlin, the Town's Chief Administrative Officer, took the lead on negotiating a potential settlement with Morgan Management and decided to update the Board on a proposed resolution to the lawsuit during its March 12, 2012 meeting. Prior to holding this and another meeting in March, Chairman Sheldon, Vice-Chair Jane Allen, and Mr. Frohlin met to create the meeting agendas. According to Mr.
The Commission unanimously voted by roll call to authorize Attorney Vivenzo to reach a settlement agreement. At the conclusion of the executive session, the Board reconvened in open session and adjourned. DISCUSSION The Open Meeting Law was enacted to eliminate much of the secrecy surrounding deliberation and decisions on which public policy is based. Ghiglione v. School Board of Southbridge, 376 Mass. 70, 72 (1978).
. - Negotiations, proposals, and settlement discussions with Northeastern University. [2] The decision to use the Towns legal standing and voluntarily join an existing private lawsuit requiring the defense of Nahant Preservation Trust and 27 named individuals. [3] The formulation of the Eminent Domain article and related legal strategies, including: - Justifications for pursuing eminent domain. - Risk assessments and legal advisories. - Any influence
Soldiers Home management asserted their contractual rights stating that if the Union 7 At the hearing, the Union submitted a copy of its settlement agreement with the Employer. According to the settlement, the parties specifically agree[d] to meet in good faith and negotiate the parameters of a [g]lobal [rje-bid at the Chelsea Soldiers Home.
The Charging Party focused her questioning of Attorney Magner on why the polling was not mentioned in the settlement agreement. However, as Attorney Magner explained the polling was a verbal condition precedent set by the Commonwealth. John Magner. Testimony of The settlement agreement states the parties would negotiate the parameters of the global re-bid. Respondent Exhibit 5.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. settlement. 2.
In or around April 2017, before the Employer conducted a new global re-bid, the Union polled bargaining unit members to determine whether they wanted to participate in the new global re-bid process that resulted from the settlement of Case No. SUP-17-5717. 19. At a membership meeting on April 27, 2017, a majority of bargaining members voted against participating in a new global re-bid process. 20.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): {O 40. Name Beverly Municipal Employees Association 42. Telephone Number 617-523-2500 41.