Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Kristin Freeman, Esq. Page 6 September 13, 2024 SPR24/2466 In light of the pending litigation, I decline to opine on this matter at this time.
In light of the active litigation, it is determination that the requested records at issue in this appeal are the subject of disputeinactivelitigation. Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). It should be noted that a change in the status of this action could impact the applicability of 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b)(1). Conclusion Accordingly, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed.
Conclusion Accordingly, as the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). It should be noted that a change in the status of the litigation could impact the applicability of950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Joseph Pantoni
Wallack for residential parking permit data that is the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation relating to this Office's previous determination in the matter. See SPR17/0626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records; City of Somerville v. Rebecca Murray, as Supervisor of Public Records (Somerville), No. 1581CV04911. Accordingly, I decline to opine on these matters at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, Rebecca S.
Wallack for residential parking permit data that is the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation relating to this Office's previous determination in the matter. See SPR17/0626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records; City of Somerville v. Rebecca Murray, as Supervisor of Public Records (Somerville), No. 1581CV04911. Accordingly, I decline to opine on these matters at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, Rebecca S.
However, the District understands that the public records are subjects of disputeinactivelitigation. In addition, the District explained, [a]ccordingly, the District is withholding the documents from production on this basis. Based on the Districts response, it is unclear what exemption it is claiming to withhold the requested records.
Cambridge appeal (SPRJ 71625) In my May 1oth determination pertaining to your appeal with Cambridge, I declined to opine on the matter because the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in state court relating to this Office's previous determination. See SPRI 4/626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (June 5, 2015); see also City of Somerville v.
The public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in state court relating to this Office's previous determination. See SPR14/626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (June 5, 2015); See also City of Somerville v. Williams, as Supervisor of Public Records, No. 1581CV04911 (Middlesex Superior Ct.). Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter at this time. See 950 CMR 32.08(2)(b).
Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. In light of the pending matter regarding the three files that are currently in active litigation, I decline to opine on this matter at this time.
Devilly Page 3 July 10, 2023 SPR23/1436 intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In an email to this office dated June 27, 2023, Mr. Raymond states, following this appeal, West Bridgewater provided a compliant response, so the PRD can close SPR23-1436 as moot. In light of Mr.
The Departments April 13th Response In its April 13, 2023 response, the Department advised, ...the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.