It is my understanding that the legal issues surrounding the public status of the records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in the Suffolk Superior Court. See Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Dep't of Criminal Justice Info. Servs., Civil Action No. 1584CV01404. Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 CMR 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S.
Raymond further states, [the Department] has not met its burden to explain how the records relate to the [active litigation] Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: Chief Eric Gillis Page 4 July 18, 2023 SPR23/1535 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or
One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 (617) 727-2832 Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre pre@sec.state.ma.us Attorney Walsh Page2 January 8, 2019 SPR18/2084 Conclusion Whereas the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b).
Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Kristin Freeman, Esq. Page 6 September 13, 2024 SPR24/2466 In light of the pending litigation, I decline to opine on this matter at this time.
In light of the active litigation, it is determination that the requested records at issue in this appeal are the subject of disputeinactivelitigation. Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). It should be noted that a change in the status of this action could impact the applicability of 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b)(1). Conclusion Accordingly, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed.
Conclusion Accordingly, as the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). It should be noted that a change in the status of the litigation could impact the applicability of950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Joseph Pantoni
Wallack for residential parking permit data that is the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation relating to this Office's previous determination in the matter. See SPR17/0626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records; City of Somerville v. Rebecca Murray, as Supervisor of Public Records (Somerville), No. 1581CV04911. Accordingly, I decline to opine on these matters at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, Rebecca S.
Wallack for residential parking permit data that is the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation relating to this Office's previous determination in the matter. See SPR17/0626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records; City of Somerville v. Rebecca Murray, as Supervisor of Public Records (Somerville), No. 1581CV04911. Accordingly, I decline to opine on these matters at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, Rebecca S.
However, the District understands that the public records are subjects of disputeinactivelitigation. In addition, the District explained, [a]ccordingly, the District is withholding the documents from production on this basis. Based on the Districts response, it is unclear what exemption it is claiming to withhold the requested records.
Cambridge appeal (SPRJ 71625) In my May 1oth determination pertaining to your appeal with Cambridge, I declined to opine on the matter because the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in state court relating to this Office's previous determination. See SPRI 4/626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (June 5, 2015); see also City of Somerville v.
The public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in state court relating to this Office's previous determination. See SPR14/626 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (June 5, 2015); See also City of Somerville v. Williams, as Supervisor of Public Records, No. 1581CV04911 (Middlesex Superior Ct.). Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter at this time. See 950 CMR 32.08(2)(b).