Pending Litigation or Administrative Matter 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
Pending Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: Allison Mondello Page 7 January 10, 2025 SPR25/0060 the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) (the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation.) Further, it is unclear what exemption or legal basis under the Public Records Law the Office is claiming applies to withhold the police reports.
Active Administrative Proceeding 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: The Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
Page 3 December 20, 2024 SPR24/3293 Pending Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Conclusion In light of the pending matter, I decline to opine on this matter at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b).
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Conclusion After another careful and thorough review of this matter, and in light of the ongoing litigation, I decline to opine on this matter at this time.
It is my understanding that the legal issues surrounding the public status of the records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in the Suffolk Superior Court. See, John D. Rousseau v. Massachusetts State Police et al., Civil Action No.l 784CV01032. Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 CMR 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: John D.
Turano-Flores to the City, it is my understanding that the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in Massachusetts Land Court. See Docket No. 16MISC000631 (JCC). Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 CMR 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, Rebecca S.
It is my understanding that the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in U.S. District Court. See Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-10107. Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 CMR 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, ~~mlui~ Rebecca S.
It is my understanding that the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation in U.S. District Court. See Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-10107. Accordingly, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 CMR 32.08(2)(b). Sincerely, ~(fHJJAiAf!Rebecca S. Murray Supenrisor of Records cc: Edward F. George, Jr., Esq.