Grievance Procedure The purpose of this Article is to establish a procedure for the settlement of grievances which involve the interpretation and application of a specific provision of this Agreement. All such grievances shall be handled as provided in this Article. A. The objective of both parties is the prompt resolution of all grievances at the lowest possible organizational level.

This current action by the employer is a repudiation of the settlement agreement to resolve SUP- 20-8060 signed O/A November 4 &9, 2020 which states in part the employer will not utilize interviews when making permanent promotional appointments to the ranks of Sergeant or Lieutenant."

This current action by the employer is a repudiation of the settlement agreement to resolve SUP- 20-8060 signed O/A November 4 &9, 2020 which states in part the employer "will not utilize interviews when making permanent promotional appointments to the ranks of Sergeant or Lieutenant."

This represented a unilateral change in practice, for which the City failed to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard, and an unlawful repudiation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement and a settlement agreement. By these and other acts, the party complained of has interfered with, restrained, and/or coerced rights guaranteed by the Law. DLR FORM-005 (page 1) Revised 11/07 14.

As the Charging Party noted in the cover letter to the appeal, the Charging Party and the Respondent had reached a settlement agreement before the Dismissal of MUP-16-5571 was issued. That settlement agreement is attached to this letter. The Charging Party continues to contend that the Dismissal was based on factual errors and mistakes of law and that the Dismissal was unsupported by the record of the in-person investigation.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): 40. Name | - Brookline Fire Fighters Association Local 950 IAFF, AFL-CIO 41.

However, please note that the parties reached a settlement agreement on January 9, 2016, the day before the dismissal was issued, resolving the charge of prohibited practice. Nevertheless, the Charging Party was compelled by the factual and legal errors contained in the dismissal to challenge the Hearing Officers conclusions. If this issue arises again, it is imperative that the charging party not be prejudiced by the erroneous dismissal.

The Indemnifying Party shall not consent to the entry of any judgment or enter into any settlement with respect to the matter for which indemnification is sought without the prior written consent of the Indemnified Person (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld) unless the judgment or settlement involves the payment of money damages only and does not require the acknowledgement of the validity of any claim. (e) Payments.

It was agreed ess" upon to remain in abeyance barr ing a settlement. I was wrongful ly support my right to statutory arbi tration. The union president during the process decided to incl executive board as to whether I ude the would be able to access arbitrat ion. This was due to the conflict members within the union.

All documents constituting any settlement agreement between an identified person and the Town referenced in a news article on March 16, 2018 and in a copy of civil litigation complaint (complaint) filed in Essex Superior Court; 2. All documents and correspondence received or sent to settle the matters raised in the complaint (including any payment; copy of any checks, etc); 3.

Colomb Ce: Subject: Efile DLR (EOL) RE: SPEA/Mansfield MUP-16-5403 Attachments: MUP-16-5403 Settlement Agreement {fully executed].pdf TimeMattersID: MAD40A72071D6841 Hi Jen: Attached, please find the fully executed settlement agreement in this matter. With this email, the Union hereby withdraws charge MUP-16-5403. Thanks, Jill Jillian M. Ryan, Esq. | 328s cee PY Sme Pyle Rome Ehrenberg PC Boston Northampton, Mass. Burlington, Vt.

Colomb Cc: jen.maldonado-ong@massmail.state.ma.us; efile.dlr@massmail.state.ma.us Subject: RE: SPEA/Mansfield MUP-16-5403 Hi Jen: We have a settlement agreement drafted and are in agreement on all terms. We expect the agreement to be fully executed by Monday and will forward a copy to you once it is all set.

Fa Yes [| No fait accompli Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04/17). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Southeastern Public Employees Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Jillian M, Ryan 617-367-7200 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

The parties have agreed to a settlement in principle in which Messrs. Hurley and Ford have agreed to accept a significantly reduced amount of damages in return for being promptly promoted to such sergeant positions. In order to effectuate this settlementall parties are jointly requesting the Civil Service Commission, acting pursuant to its powers 5 set forth in Chapter 310 of the Acts of 1993, to order that Mr. Hurley and Mr.

The parties have executed a settlement agreement. NEWTON FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 863, LAFF. _, Byfis its Asgorney, Attorney, L << SL YAS Paul T. Hynes, /Esq. ee id BBO No. 545952\ Angoff, Goldman, Manning, & Hynes, P.C. 100 River Ridge Dr., Suite 203 Norwood, MA 02062 (781) 255-7700 Dated: March 27, 2018 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |, Paul T.

unless reasonable settlement efforts have been Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). tor for settlement discussions. The Division may refer the charge to a Division media INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Employee Organization (O), |O 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employer (E): 41. Representative to contact 42. Telephone 40. Name Number |Paul T.

Singh, Samantha (DLR) From: Atwater, Susan (DLR) Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 2:16 PM To: Singh, Samantha (DLR) Subject: Closing 2 cases Hi Samantha, Please save the settlement email below into two cases, MUP-17-6415, City of Newton, and MUP-17-6418, City of Newton, and close them both out in time matters. I'll save the email in MUP-17-6414. Thank you. Susan Susan L. Atwater, Esq.