Teachers Assn., 28 MLC 160, 163 MUPL-4153 (October 23, 2001) (citing Massachusetts State Lottery Commission, 22 MLC 1519, 1522 SUPL-2579 (February 16, 1996)). If the contract language is ambiguous, the Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (Board) must 2 Dismissal (cont.) MUPL-15-4611 examine applicable bargaining history to determine whether the parties reached an agreement.
Mass State Lottery Commission, SUPL-2579 (1996) In this case the Town failed to do what it agreed to do. It created an unreasonable impediment to reaching the agreement with Newton that was needed to fulfill its agreement with the Union Furthermore, it was bad faith to have agreed to the Union proposal when the Chief knew that he would not do what was needed to fulfill the agreement.
Teachers Ass'n, 28 MLC 163 Massachusetts (citing contract State language Lottery Commission, applicable bargaining agreement. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 28 MLC 8, 11 (2001). whether Board 1519, If the to determine the MLC (1996)). history is ambiguous, 22 the must parties at 1522 examine reached an There is '? The Department discharged Charley on October 21, 2003. On July 14, 2005, an arbitrator upheld the discharge. brought against Charley.
See also, Massachusetts State Lottery Commission, 22 MLC 1519 (1996) (union violated Section 10(b)(2) of the Law by undermining the parties' grievance-arbitration process and by criticizing bargaining unit members for testifying voluntarily at an arbitration hearing in favor of the employer's position).
In the case of employees of the state lottery commission, employer shall mean the state lottery commission or its designee. In the case of employees of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, the employer shall mean the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
In the case of employees of the state lottery commission, employer shall mean the state lottery commission or its designee. In the case of employees of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, the employer shall mean the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
In the case of employees of the state lottery commission, employer shall mean the state lottery commission or its designee. In the case of employees of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, the employer shall mean the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
See also Massachusetts State Lottery Commission 22 MLRR 1251 (1996); City of Boston 28 MLRR 64 (2002); City of Somerville 29 MLRR 43 (2003). At hearing, the Union indicated it seeks extraordinary remedies in this case. The School Committee, however, argues that the Department should not ignore precedent by granting remedies above and beyond orders to produce any outstanding information. The BSC submits relations between the parties.
(b) The employer, other than the board of higher education or the board of trustees of the University of Massachusetts, the chief justice for administration and management, a county sheriff, the PCA quality home care workforce council, the alcoholic beverage control commission, or the state lottery commission, shall submit to the appropriate legislative body within thirty days after the date on which the agreement is executed by the parties, a request
In the case of employees of the state lottery commission, employer shall mean the state lottery commission or its designee. In the case of employees of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, the employer shall mean the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
In the case of employees of the state lottery commission, employer shall mean the state lottery commission or its designee. In the case of employees of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, the employer shall mean the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
Board of Higher Education, 26 MLC at 93; Massachusetts State Lottery Commission, 22 MLC at 1472. the right to review the information and make the information would Boston, 35 MLC its own assessment be useful in its role as bargaining The Union had here whether or not representative See City of 95, 102 (2008) (raising the possibility that a union and an employer could review the same information and draw different conclusions as to the usefulness of
See, also, Massachusetts State Lottery Commission, 22 MLC 1519 (1996) (union violated Section 10(b)(2) of the Law by undermining the parties grievance-arbitration process and by criticizing bargaining unit members for testifying voluntarily at an arbitration hearing in favor of the employer's position).