COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES Ne Nee and WHEREAS, the parties desire to settle in an amicable manner all claims which have arisen regarding the above charges, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Developmental Services (hereinafter DDS), AFSCME Council 93 (hereinafter the Union), through their respective representatives, have successfully entered into negotiations which have resulted in a compromise settlement
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individu (1), Employee al Organiza(0), tionO Employer(E). | 40. Name AFSCME Council 93, Local 554 Poo AL. Representative to contact Atty. Joseph L. DeLorey 42.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
In this position, she is also responsible for participating in labor negotiations with the various local union representatives on advancing labor/management proposals and approving settlements and agreements. Id. Joann Wax is the Central Residential Services (CRS) Director for the region. Id at | 8. Ms.
(emphasis added) The Parties' Settlement Discussions Regarding the Cemetery Posting Arbitration. C. 1. On or about February 1 9, 2020, the Town and the Union met for a scheduled mediation session in connection with its successor collective bargaining negotiations. After the mediation session, Attorney D.M. Moschos and Union Business Agent, Chris Adams, discussed the issue of the filling of the vacant Cemetery Foreman position.2 2.
Hurley Building 19 Staniford Street, 1st Floor Boston, MA 02114 Re: Town of Palmer and UFCW, Local 1459 MUPL-20-7959 and MUP-20-7913 Dear Director Roberts: Please be advised that the Town and the Union have reached a settlement of the above matters, and have agreed to withdraw their respective charges with prejudice to refiling. The Town of Palmer hereby withdraws its charge with prejudice to refiling.
Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name UFCW, Local 1459 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number c/o Terence E. Coles 617 367 7200 - Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
Thereafter, Duddy and OKeeffe discussed what O'Keeffe would want for a settlement, and also began to discuss the possibility of a termination pension.* Duddy told OKeeffe that she would be well-advised to accept the suspension since she had no medical support for the first 30 days of her leave, but Duddy also offered to try to negotiate the suspension out of the proposed settlement.*' Duddy discussed the settlement offer with Bevington at some unspecified
However, the DLR will provide a mediator to assist the parties in reaching a voluntary settlement if both parties agree to mediation at any point before the appellate process is concluded. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS
Nor does the Unions excuse for not filing for arbitration under 42 on time based on its efforts to produce an acceptable settlement for OKeeffe hold water. (HT Vol. II, December 19, 2016, pp. 94-97.)? And, Connolly admitted that once the 60 days 2 While settlement efforts go to the issue of damages, Duddy was clearly dissembling in her testimony regarding OKeefe not wanting to go back to work. (HT Vol. IV, pp. 163-165.) If nothing else, Jt.
On December 20, 2020, 10 the SJC denied the request. 11 In the meantime, once the Hearing Officers decision issued, and on multiple 12 occasions thereafer, the BTU made settlement offers to OKeeffe in an effort to satisfy its 13 obligations under the DLRs, and then the CERBs, make-whole remedy.
Because the union counsel failed to inform Appellant of a settlement offer supplied by Monique Jackson of the American Federation of teachers in November of 2014, the union should be ordered to provide that payment to Appellant with interest within the next 30 days.
Leo From: Fader, Ira [mailto:IFader@massteacher.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 6:09 PM To: Atwater, Susan (DLR); Leo Peloquin Cc: Stephanie Smith Subject: RE: The Falmouth health insurance case settlement The settlement agreement was signed on Friday 5/23, and Leo provided me with a copy that day. Accordingly, I can state that the FEA now seeks the dismissal of the case at this stage with prejudice to refiling.
Leo From: Fader, Ira [mailto:IFader@massteacher.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 6:09 PM To: Atwater, Susan (DLR); Leo Peloquin Cc: Stephanie Smith Subject: RE: The Falmouth health insurance case settlement The settlement agreement was signed on Friday 5/23, and Leo provided me with a copy that day. Accordingly, I can state that the FEA now seeks the dismissal of the case at this stage with prejudice to refiling.
Leo From: Fader, Ira [mailto:IFader@massteacher.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 6:09 PM To: Atwater, Susan (DLR); Leo Peloquin Cc: Stephanie Smith Subject: RE: The Falmouth health insurance case settlement The settlement agreement was signed on Friday 5/23, and Leo provided me with a copy that day. Accordingly, I can state that the FEA now seeks the dismissal of the case at this stage with prejudice to refiling.
Leo From: Fader, Ira [mailto:IFader@massteacher.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 6:09 PM To: Atwater, Susan (DLR); Leo Peloquin Cc: Stephanie Smith Subject: RE: The Falmouth health insurance case settlement The settlement agreement was signed on Friday 5/23, and Leo provided me with a copy that day. Accordingly, I can state that the FEA now seeks the dismissal of the case at this stage with prejudice to refiling.
Regs. 15.05 (3) (2008), Petitioner withdraws the Charge of Prohibited Practice (SUP-12-22%30) filed against the above-named Respondent on September 28, 2012; now resolved as a res lt of settlement with Respondent Union. See Settlement Agreement, attached. Accordingly, Petitioner cancels the probable cause hearing scheduled on December 4, 2012 at 10:00 AMI. Hd. E.
Under the terms of the settlement, Petitioner executed a check-off authorization with the Alliance and agreed, inter alia, to pay an agency fee equal to full union dues through payroll deductions until February 28, 2006. A true and correct copy of Petitioners check-off authorization is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 15.
Admitted On February 22, 2017, prior to the start of the arbitration hearing referred to in paragraph 8, the City and the Association resolved the grievance referred to in paragraph 7 by executing a written settlement agreement (Settlement Agreement), which provides in pertinent part: 2.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.
lV] Yes No L] Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging. party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING 17. Name Lawrence Patrolmen's Association 19. PARTY 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Matthew E. Dwyer 781-359-9777 21.
Please note: failure to allege specific facts may/will result in dismissal of the charge. part, On or about June 23, 2011, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement which provided, in relevant the of ing understand the reflect would that the parties would execute a Memorandum of Agreement that 24, parties with respect to the assignment of officers to inmates for hospital coverage.