Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84, 86, MUP-1289 (Jan. 6, 2000) (citing City of Boston, 14 MLC 1606, 1617, MUP5574 and MUP-5734 (March 25, 1988)).

AND ALCOHOL APPENDIX C - CLASSIFICATIONS ...... vee POLICY... ccscsscssssscesssesssercnsssssseees sors e eses cvensnsesenes cos sasesenesenscens 21 seeseereonsorsssonsesseccseenasens 23 seceecneesvessessnsasansnssessneesnnseceneateceeecescssssessssonssssanacessasssrsessessoocceees 33 AGREEMENT This Agreement entered into by and between the TOWN OF NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, MA (acting by and through its Board of Selectmen) hereinafter referred to as the

Springfield School Committee, 27 MLC, 15, 18 (September 1, 2000); Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84, 86 (2000) citing City of Boston, 14 MLC 1606, 1618 (1988). For example, an employer hand-picking a unions representatives significantly interferes with the administration of a union in violation of 10(a)(2).

See Springfield School Committee, 27 MLC 15,18, MUP-2521 (September 1, 2000) (citing Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84, 86 (2000) (further citations omitted)(to 2 These statements are referenced in the partial dismissal, but are not alleged as independent Section 10(a)(1) violations in the Complaint. 3 She also dismissed an independent Section 10(a)(1) allegation, which the Union did not appeal. 3 CERB Review of PC Dismissal (contd) Case No.

See, Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84, 86 (2000), citing City of Boston, 14 MLC Hills Regional Technical School District, 9 MLC 1606, 1618 (1988); See also, Blue 1271 (1982). As in Chief Justice for Administration and Management of the Trial Court and National Association of Government Employees, CERB Case No.

See Whittier Regional School Committee, 13 MLC 1325 (1987) (employer unilaterally chose the amount of an agency service fee); Blue Hills Technical School District, 9 MLC 1271 (1982) (school district established a house union): Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Unit 1), 7 MLC 1228 (1980) (employer bargained with an incumbent union after notice of a representation petition): Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84 (2000) (employer deprived an employee organization

See Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84, 86 (2000). Administration in this respect refers specifically to the internal affairs of the union, such as the deduction of union dues or the failure to acknowledge a particular union as the recognized bargaining unit. See id.; Springfield Sch. Comm., 27 MLC 15 (2000).

See Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84 (2000). The Registrys failure to accept recognized employees as bargaining unit members, and its failure to process their dues significantly undermines and interferes with the existence and administration of the Union. See Commonwealth of Massachusetts Commissioner of Administration and Finance, 27 MLC 11 (2000). Therefore, the Registry has, at the very least, violated Section 10(a)(2) of the Law. .

Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84, 86, MUP-1289 (January 6, 2000). Here, the Union did not argue or present any evidence that the City deprived it of an economic benefit. The Board has also found that an employer interferes in the existence and administration of an employee organization under Section 10(a)(2) in circumstances where there is a question as to an incumbent unions recognition.

Town of North Attleboro, 26 MLC 84, 86, MUP-1289 (January 6, 2000). Here, the Union did not argue or present any evidence that the School Committee deprived it of an economic benefit. The Board has also found that an employer interferes in the existence and administration of an employee organization under Section 10(a)(2) in circumstances where there is a question as to an incumbent unions recognition.

Town of North Attleboro 56 Mass. 15 15; 26 20; (1983). Union, AFL- England Wind, 253 29 Relations 710 Ten Local Citizen Group v. LLC, 457 Mass. 222 (2010). Commission, & 30 Commission, School Committee of Newton v. Labor Relations Commission, 388 Mass. 557 Service 29; v. App. (2000). New Labor Ct. Relations 635 17 14 (2002). West Bridgewater Police Association Relations Commission, 18 Mass. App. (1984). v. Labor Ct. 550 15 ns Statutes G.