Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): O 40. Name Ludlow Association of Town Office Support Staff 42. Telephone Number 413-654-1077 41.
Notified the Town and Town remained steadfast Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): O 40. Name Ludlow Association of Town Office Support Staff 42.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (Agreement) is entered into by and between the Town of East Longmeadow (Town), Ms. Donna Rau (Ms. Rau) and the Town of East Longmeadow Employees Union (TEU), collectively referred to herein as the Parties, in order to resolve pending matters arising out of Ms. Raus and the TEUs request that her current position for the Town be re-graded and increased in grade.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT g DEp _ aa .e7 arson SoU Forest Hills Cemetery and United Steelworkers AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 366 herewith agree to settle NLRB Case 01-CA-109752 and the related Request For Binding Arbitration before the Massachusetts Division of Labor Relations as follows: 1. | Forest Hills acknowledges that under the terms of the parties collective bargaining agreement, payment of union dues is a condition of employment. 2.
Bittner RE: City of Boston Settlement Agreement COMMENTS: PLEASE CALL (617) 624-0200 IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS OR QUESTIONS THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMEO ABOVE. IF YOU, THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE, ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU SHOULD NOT FURTHER DISSEMINATE, DISTRIBUTE, OR COPY THIS TELECOPY.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
Fa Yes a No Despite multiple requests, the Employer has refused to provide the information Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number NEPBA 978-454-3800 19. 21.
The parties settled the grievance with the following settlement; a) All parties agreed that any electrical jobs outside of your regular tour of duty, that the Campus Engineer felt were necessary, would be discussed with you as the Electrician here on campus.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
. - Representing the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFLCIO, Council 93 - HEARING OFFICERS DECISION SUMMARY This case presents two issues: whether the Department Massachusetts College of Art and Design (College of Higher Education or Employer) violated Section 10(a)(5) and, derivatively, Section 10(a)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law) by repudiating a settlement agreement dated February 15, 1995
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 2.
No Agreement Existed Between the College and the Union and the College Has Not Repudiated Any Agreement or Past Practice Count II alleges that the College "has failed to bargain in good faith with the Union by repudiating the 1995 settlement agreement in violation of Section 10(a)(5)[and Section 10(a)(1)1 ofthe Law." Complaint, j 12-13.
The unit is a unit of administrators, three of whom were hired prior to the June 5, 2013 settlement of the 2012-2015 collective bargaining agreement. The effective date of appointment was August 20, 2012 for one of the individuals and September 1, 2012 for the other two. All three were hired in the summer of 2012.
The unit is a unit of administrators, three of whom were hired prior to the June 5, 2013 settlement of the 2012-2015 collective bargaining agreement. The effective date of appointment was August 20, 2012 for one of the individuals and September 1, 2012 for the other two. All three were hired in the summer of 2012.
In Massachusetts Board of Regents of Higher Education (Regents), the former Labor Relations Commission refused to dismiss a charge that the employer claimed was moot because the grievance had been resolved by the implementation of a settlement agreement.
Please identify all legal costs associated with the referenced actions, and include all settlements made for or on behalf of the [Town] by, for or through its insurance underwriters, as well as settlements paid directly or indirectly by the Town.
Frank Tiano] and the School Committee in regard to Tianos impending resignation to take effect on July 1 and all related supporting documentation in regard to settlement terms, monetary and otherwise. Ms. Melanson also requested records of [a]ll legal costs the School Department has incurred in association with these agreements.