COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS BEFORE ARBITRATOR BRIANJ. HARRINGSTON, ESQ. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXK Arbitration In The Matter Of: x Supervisory and Professional Employees x Association x x ARB-14-3826 and x x x City of Pittsfield XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX POST-HEARING BRIEF SUBMITTED BY ITY OF PITTSFIELD INTRODUCTION This matter was heard before Arbitrator Brian J.
Greenwald COMMONWEALTH BERKSHIRE, ss OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS CASE NO.: ARB 14-3826 ) DONNA GUZZO and PITTSFIELD SUPERVISORY AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEBS ASSOCIATION, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs GRIEVANTS POST-HEARING BRIEF ) ) Vv. ) CITY OF PITTSFIELD, Defendant ) ) ) ) This is a grievance arbitration concerning a grievance filed by the Pittsfield Supervisory and Professional Employees Association (PSPEA) of the denial of a vacation day
Chapter 150, 6 is $1,000; provided, however, that the fee shall be paid in equal shares by the party seeking application and the answering party; provide: further, that the Director of the Department ofLaborRelations may, where appropriate, provide for the waiver of the filing fee for any particular controversy or classes of controversies. 2. The filing fee for an application for private sector grievance arbitration filed pursuant to M.G.L.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS In the Matter of: SALARIED EMPLOYEES AMERICA, LOCAL 9158 OF NORTH Charging Party Case No.: MUP-18-6679 and CITY OF BOSTON, Respondent RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO THE CHARGE The City denies the Union's charge as follows: 1. The City denies the factual allegations contained in the Union's charge. 2. The Charge fails to state a claim for relief.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS RHKKKERREKREREERREREKKKKKEKKKKKKR KKM RR RRR I RK In the Matter of * CITY OF BOSTON * and SENA, LOCAL 158 . * Case No. * * Date Issued: September 5, 2019 MUP-17-6211 MUP-18-6679 Hearing Officer: Kerry Bonner, Esq. Appearances: Kate Kleimola, Esq. Ellen McClintock, Esq.: Representing the City of Boston Jillian M.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS BEFORE THE COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD ****************************************************** In the Matter of * * CITY OF BOSTON * * * and * * SENA, LOCAL 9158 * * ****************************************************** Case No. MUP-17-6211 MUP-18-6679 Date Issued: March 31, 2020 Board Members Participating: Marjorie F. Wittner, CERB Chair Katherine G.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS BEFORE THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF NORTH AMERICA, Local 9158, Charging Party MUP-17-6211 & 18-6679 and THE CITY OF BOSTON, Respondent CITY OF BOSTON POST-HEARING BRIEF On September 11,2017, the Charging Party, the Salaried Employees of North America, Local 9158 (hereinafter, "SENA" or "the Union") filed a Charge with the Department ofLabor Relations (hereinafter, "DLR") alleging
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS CHARGE OF PROHIBITED M.G.L. .150E INSTRUCTIONS: Answer all applicable questions. PRACTICE Case No. Date Filed MUP-1&-L479 | 6 OF -1 Failing to provide Infonnation may result in the dismissal of the charge.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS ____________________________________ ) In the Matter of: ) ) CITY OF BOSTON, ) ) Respondent, ) ) and ) ) SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF ) NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 9158, ) ) Charging Party. ) ____________________________________) Case Nos. MUP-17-6211 MUP-18-6679 CHARGING PARTYS AMENDED POST-HEARING BRIEF I.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS ____________________________________ ) In the Matter of: ) ) CITY OF BOSTON, ) ) Respondent, ) ) and ) ) SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF ) NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 9158, ) ) Charging Party. ) ____________________________________) Case Nos. MUP-17-6211 MUP-18-6679 CHARGING PARTYS POST-HEARING BRIEF I.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS CHARGE OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE M.G.L. .150E INSTRUCTIONS: Answer all applicable questions. Case No. Date Filed Mops -4SEE\ OS- Ho 4S Failing to provide information may result in the dismissal of the charge.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS DLR CASE NO. MUP-15-4588 JOHN FITZGERALD, Complainant ANSWER OF RESPONDENT TO COMPLAINANTS CHARGE OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE TOWN OF MONSON, Respondant NOW COMES, the Respondent, Town of Monson and answers the Complainants Charge with up of Prohibited Practice as follows: 1. The Town of Monson has threatened Mr.
Tl il THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS 19 STANIFORD STREET, 1" FLOOR er BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02114 Email: efile.dir@state.ma.us Telephone: (617) 626-7132 FAX: (617) 626-7157 www.mass.gov/dir CHARLES D. BAKER GOVERNOR KARYN E. POLITO COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD MARJORIE F. WITTNER LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR CHAIR ERICA F.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS Case No. Date Filed PETITION TO INITIATE GRIEVANCE ARBITRATION = AhA-1S44916| )[- 02-19 1. Employer's Name STONEHAM 3. 2. Telephone Number SCHOOL COMMITTEE 781-279-3802 | Employer's Address (street and no., city/town, state, and zip code) 149 FRANKLIN STREET, STONEHAM, MA 02180 5. Employer's Labor Relations Representative LES OLSON 8. 10. 4. Fax Number 6.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS FEATHER RERERERAERT RRR EREREEEEEREEREREE In the Matter of: TOWN OF KINGSTON and KINGSTON TOWN EMPLOYEES RIKI ATTIRE * * * Case No.: MUP-19-7210 * Date Issued: July 16, 2019 * EARTHEN IRE REET EREEERAE COMPLAINT OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL On March 12, 2019, Kingston Town Employees (Union) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department ofLabor Relations (DLR)
COMMONWEAL TH OF MASSACHUSETTTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS CHARGE OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE M.G.L. c. 150E AMENDED DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE Case No. Date Filed MUP-23-9976 INSTRUCTIONS: Answer all applicable questions. Failing to provide information may result in the dismissal of the charge. File an original and two (2) copies of this form with the Division.
@ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS CHARGE OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE M.G.L.c.150E DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE Case No. Date Filed MUP-23-9976 4/7/2023 INSTRUCTIONS: Answer all applicable questions. Failing to provide information may result iin the dismissai of the charge.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS ) NEWTON POLICE ASSOCIATION ) Charging Party ) ) Vv. ) MUP-23-9976 ) CITY OF NEWTON ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENTS RESPONSE AND STATEMENT OF DEFENSES On or about April 7, 2023, the Charging Party, the Newton Police Association (NPA or Union), filed a charge alleging that the Respondent, the City of Newton, violated Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E, 10(a)(5) and derivatively, 10(a)(
Retum to landing page: httos://cms.dia.eol.mass.gov/pis/htmidb/Awwv_flow.accept 2/2 214/22, 1:15 PM https://cms.dia.eol.mass.gov/pis/htmldb/wwv_flow.accept | 1 error has occurred COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS CHARGE OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE M.G.L. .150E MUPL-22-9108 MUPL-22-9108 02/04/2022 02/04/2022 INSTRUCTIONS: Answer all applicable questions, Failing to provide information may result in the dismissal of the charge.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS ____________________________________ In the Matter of: ) ) JOANNA M. WILLIAMS, ) Case No.
Williams (Williams) filed a charge of prohibited practice (Charge) with the Department ofLaborRelations (DLR) alleging that the Westfield Professional Municipal Employees Association (WPMEA or Association) violated Sections 10(b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law).
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS In the Matter of TOWN OF ACUSHNET and Case No.: MUP-22-9650 Date Issued: March 21, 2023 UNITED STEELWORKERS COMPLAINT OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL On October 31, 2022, the United Steelworkers (Union) filed a charge with the Department ofLabor Relations (DLR), which it amended on November 9, 2022, alleging that Town of Acushnet (Town or Employer) had engaged in prohibited
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OFLABORRELATIONS Case No. MUP-22-9650 In the Matter of TOWN OF ACUSHNET ANSWER OF THE TOWN OF ACUSHNET and UNITED STEELWORKERS NOW COMES the Town of Acushnet (the Town) and hereby files its Answer to the Complaint dated March 21, 2023 by responding to the correspondingly numbered paragraphs of the Complaint as follows: COUNT I 1. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted.1 4.