On August 2, our office executed a settlement agreement with the Board to resolve OML 201664 prior to a hearing. The Board agreed to comply with all applicable sections of the Open Meeting Law and the Attorney General's regulations in the future. The meeting at issue in this decision occurred just weeks later.
Contrast 3 Open Meeting Law determinations may be found at the Attorney General's website, www.mass.gov/ago/openmeeting. 4 G.L. c. 112, 65C (meetings of the Board of Registration in Pharmacy held for the purpose of conducting investigative conferences prior to the issuance of an order to show cause or for purposes of discussing the terms of a negotiated settlement of a complaint against a license shall not be considered open meetings) (emphasis added
The Town Manager also shared information and thoughts regarding current trends in salary increases for municipal employees, certain proposals for the upcoming negotiations, advice and opinions of town counsel, and the possible impact of a recent settlement with the school union on negotiations.
During the executive session, the Board discussed and reviewed the terms of a settlement agreement with PEC on health insurance plans for union employees. DISCUSSION The Open Meeting Law was enacted to eliminate much of the secrecy surrounding deliberations and decisions on which public policy is based. Ghiglione v. School Committee of Southbridge, 376 Mass. 70, 72 (1978).
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
In additi hearing time on, the Parties are they are willing directed to confer to engage the se as to whether rvices of a DLR Utilization of a medi Mediator for Poss ator will not delay ib le settlement. the commence ment of the Hearin g.