Page 6 September 10, 2020 SPR20/1481 Please be advised that in a recent decision from the Attorney Generals Office (AGO) regarding a similar matter, the AGO found that . . . a resume submitted as part of an employment application falls within a core category of personnel information useful in making employment decisions, and is therefore absolutely exempt from disclosure under the first clause of Exemption (c).

By this same e-mail, Officer DiRenzo also requested Whelans thoughts on involving an outside agency in the investigation, such as the Attorney Generals Office or the State Police. 29. The Department maintains a book known as the Redbook that is used to document employee time, such as vacation, sick leave, personal, shift assignments, etc.. 30.

However, we order that any current members of the Council who were not present for that training view the training video available at the Attorney General's website, 1 and that the Council certify within 30 days after receiving this determination that all members have attended or reviewed the video of an Open Meeting Law training conducted by the Attorney General's Office.

It is recommended that the parties contact the Attorney Generals Office if they seek a determination on this issue. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Heather MacDonald

Public Records Requirement The Massachusetts Office of the Secretary of State has ruled (with the concurrence of the Attorney Generals Office) that certain email correspondence are public documents in accordance with the definition of a Public Record as identified in Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 4, Section 7, and Chapter 66, Section 10.

Gulluni District Attorney for the Hampden District 50 State Street Springfield, Massachusetts O1102 Re: Potential Exculpatory Evidence Related to the Nathan Bill's Investigation Dear District Attorney Gulluni: On April 11, 2019, the Criminal Bureau of the Attorney General's Office provided you formal written notice of the substance of the allegations that gave rise to indictments against then-current or former officers of the Springfield Police Department

Gulluni District Attorney for the Hampden District 50 State Street Springfield, Massachusetts O1102 Re: Potential Exculpatory Evidence Related to the Nathan Bill's Investigation Dear District Attorney Gulluni: On April 11, 2019, the Criminal Bureau of the Attorney General's Office provided you forma l written notice of the substance of the allegations that gave rise to indictments against then-current or former officers of the Springfield Police Department

Gulluni District Attorney for the Hampden District 50 State Street Springfield, Massachusetts O1102 Re: Potential Exculpatory Evidence Related to the Nathan Bill's Investigation Dear District Attorney Gulluni: On April 11, 2019, the Criminal Bureau of the Attorney General's Office provided you formal written notice of the substance of the allegations that gave rise to indictments against then-current or former officers of the Springfield Police Department

The Complainant alleges that that Selection Committee intentionally violated the Law because 1) before the Selection Committee entered into executive session, the Complainant told the Selection Committee that he believed they were entering executive session for an improper purpose; and 2) another subcommittee of the School Committee was recently found in violation of the Open Meeting Law by the Attorney Generals Office . . ..

I have authored a letter to the Attorney General office to support the request of ICC for a Covenant Not to Sue. If I can assist this venture in any way with your office, please do not hesitate to make that request. William Martin Mayor ee, The Town of Greenfield is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer, A designated Green Community and a recipient of the Leading by Example" Award

Covenant Not To Sue We assume that ICC will obtain a Covenant No To Sue (CNTS) through the Attorney General's office. The CNTS will require deed searches and owner Notifications for multiple downgradient properties within site limits. The City or Honeywell should pay for, or reimburse ICC for, all technical and legal costs, including but not limited to LSP services, attorney fees, and deed searches.

However, the c.21E s.5C provides a liability 6 endpoint for eligible persons; bidders may contact the Attorney Generals office to discuss the feasibility of a Covenant Not to Sue Agreement for this site. Proposers should conduct their own review and assessment of the reports completed to date and/or the environmental condition on the site, as the DEP may not issue a closure letter before transfer to the selected developer. 7.

Strahan to the Attorney General's Office (Attachment 3)." The Division further asserts "[i]ndeed, the very basis of the defendants' motion to dismiss was a failure to provide pre-suit notice to the defendants as required by the federal Endangered Species Act. Mr. Strahan's filings indicate that he will refile his lawsuit after complying with this requirement." You further note that "[i]mportantly, Mr.

The Town further claims that Attorney Murphy's Open Meeting Law complaint seeking access to executive session minutes was denied by the Attorney General's Office (AGO) on May 29, 2018. Please be advised that the interpretation of the Open Meeting Law falls within the authority of the AGO and not this office. Therefore, I decline to provide a determination as to the status of the records withheld under the Open Meeting Law. See G. L. c. 30A, 23.