Herman requested . . . any and all communications related to the workers in the office of the chief medical examiner getting the COVID-19 vaccine. Please provide me with copies of any and all communications related to the above public records request that are in the files of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security. Previous appeal This request was the subject of a previous appeal.

Montel requested: [A] complete copy of the chief medical Examiners office case file in the matter of COMM. V. MONEL, MICHAEL ANTHONY docket NO. 9179CR01079.

Murray Supervisor of Records May 18, 2018 SPR18/682 Lisa Riccobene Chief of Staff Office of the Chief Examiner 720 Albany Street Boston, MA 02118 Dear Lisa Riccobene: I have received the petition of Emory Snell appealing the nonresponse of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr.

Office ofthe ChiefMedical Examiner 720 Albany Street Boston, MA 02118 Dear Attorney Faherty: I have received the petition of Richard Martin appealing the nonresponse of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (Office) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66 10(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Mr.

Office of the Chief Medical Examiner 720 Albany Street Boston, MA 02118 Dear Attorney Faherty: I have received the petition of Edwin Mejia appealing the nonresponse of the Office of the ChiefMedical Examiner (Office) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66 10(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Mr. Mejia requested records regarding the employment work schedule of a specifically identified employee.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Second clause of Exemption (c) privacy Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the publics right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Commr of Real Property Dept, 380 Mass. 623, 625 (1980).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Second clause of Exemption (c) privacy Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the publics right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Commr of Real Property Dept, 380 Mass. 623, 625 (1980).

In a response dated October 4, 2016 the District Attorney explained that it intends to withhold the responsive records pursuant to the Chief Medical Examiner powers and duties statute. G. L. c. 38 2; G. L. c. 4 7(26)(a). Exemption (a) Exemption (a), known as the statutory exemption, permits the withholding of records that are: specifically or by necessary implication exempted from disclosure by statute G.

Office of the Chief Medical Examiner 720 Albany Street Boston, MA 02118 Dear Attorney Faherty: I have received the petition of Carlos Hemiquez appealing the nomesponse of the Office of the ChiefMedical Examiner (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66 10(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Mr. Hemiquez requested a copy of the Office's entry log books for a specific time period.

.: I have received the petition of Attorney Diego Ibarguen appealing the response of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) to requests for public records made by his client, Kristen Setera ofWCVB-TV. G. L. c. 66 10(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Ms. Setera requested copies and access to: 1.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). While it is generally held that one's right to privacy is extinguished at death, an individual's privacy interest in his or her medical information survives death. See Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. at 134. Despite the Department's response, it is uncertain which redacted portions of the record the Department is claiming constitute medical information.