Specifically, Attorney O'Meara-Castello requested a copy of any settlement agreement entered into between Fuad Akbar and the MBTA relative to Mr. Akbar's claims in his lawsuit against the MBTA (Suffolk Superior Court Docket No. 09-0503-D). Under the Public Records Law and the Access Regulations (Regulations) all requests for public records must be met with a written response within ten (10) days ofthe request. G.
Worcester Settlements Erica F. Crystal, Esq. Director Department of Labor Relations Charles F. Hurley Building 19 Staniford Street, 1st Floor Boston, MA 02114 (617) 626-6923 Erica.Crystal@state.ma.us This e-mail message, Including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged Information.
Gerhardson requested the following: Records related to the city/town of Arlingtons use of money received through the Statewide Opioid Settlement, including the following: - FY2023, FY2024 municipal expenditure report as submitted to caremass.org - the citys balance sheet for its opioid settlement funds account - records related to expenditures made from this account, or with settlement funds that demonstrate what the money was spent on, for what purpose
Gerhardson requested the following: Records related to the city/town of Rochesters use of money received through the Statewide Opioid Settlement, including the following: - FY2023, FY2024 municipal expenditure report as submitted to caremass.org - the citys balance sheet for its opioid settlement funds account - records related to expenditures made from this account, or with settlement funds that demonstrate what the money was spent on, for what purpose
The attached settlement agreement (Exihibt A) was agreed to by the District and the EAW clearly stating the evaluation process for Leonard Zalauskas starting with the 2018-2019 school year. This Agreement was entered in order to resolve a prior charge under G.L. c. 150E. The District has repudiated the prior agreement by failing to adhere to the process set forth in the agreement.
In February of 2018, the Committee and the Union entered settlement agreement (Agreement), which stated in pertinent part: ....1. The School Committee will withdraw and eliminate any and all written performance evaluation materials prepared or otherwise maintained by its employees and/or officials relating to Mr.
Zalauskas contributed to any failure on the part of the Respondent to comply with terms of the Settlement Agreement through his own conduct in connection with the evaluation process.
In response, on October 23, 2017, you submitted a document entitled Settlement Agreement and General Release of Claims and email correspondence between SEIU, Local 888 (Union) Field Representative Steve D'Amico, and Employer Attorney Kier Wachterhauser. The DLR has reviewed the documents that you submitted in response to the show cause notice and has decided to dismiss the charge without an investigation.
Xx Yes L] No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name TIMOTHY 19. SHE \e: Representative to contact ZOUNSeN The Charging Party is an: VW x] Individual b re ATe~O1 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 22. Cort 20. Telephone wae ie BA MAPLEWOOD CIRCLE BRockTon GO 1956 OKA 21.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT . In the interest of moving forward, the City of Newton (City) and Newton Firefi ghters (Union) agree not to litigate Department of Labor Relations (DLR) case number MUP-15-4750. . The parties expressly understand and agree that this is a settlement to resolve a disputed claim. This settlement agreement does not constitute an admission of liability. .
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): O 40. Name Local 863, International 41. Representative to contact |42.
n addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.
Eustace, Kimberly (DLR) From: Atwater, Susan (DLR) Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 2:43 PM To: Kelley, Gwenn (EOL); Eustace, Kimberly (DLR) Subject: Settlement and withdrawal of MUP-15-4489, City of Medford Can you close MUP-15-4489, City of Medford based on the withdrawal below? Thanks! Susan L. Atwater, Esq. Hearing Officer/Arbitrator Department of Labor Relations Charles F.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been imade by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (O), a OZ BHGTSt du 7 |O Employer (E): | | | | 40. Name Medford Police Superior Officers c/o Gerard /41.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
Having been instructed to onboard Fountain as an intermittent police officer, In a demand for settlement dated October 8, 2020, Fountains attorney, George C. Malonis, Esq., wrote in part: Contrary to Councilor Simards misleading and inflammatory statements, aimed squarely at Mr.