She also stated that she was going to call the Attorney General's Office for clarification. On August 17, 2010, the Board again convened in a posted meeting. The August 17, 2010 meeting notice included the topic "F. Open Meeting Complaint." During the open session of the meeting, former Chairman Petraitis read the complaint and the amendment you proposed to the minutes. Discussion among the Board ensued, during which Mr.

In addition, Chair Katseff requested an extension of time to respond to the complaint, stating, "I am (by copy of this complaint response) asking the Attorney General's office for a 30 calendar day extension."

Requests for the Attorney General's review of an Open Meeting Law complaint must be filed with the Attorney General's Office within 90 days of the alleged violation. 940 C.M.R. 29.05(7). The complaint identifies June 8 as the day of the alleged violation. Therefore, a request for further review would have been due by September 6.

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE ASHBURTON PLACE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 MAURA HEALEY (617) 727-2200 ATTORNEY GENERAL www.mass.gov/ago April 20, 2018 OML 2018-56 Andrew Stern, General Counsel Group Insurance Commission 19 Stamford Street Boston, MA 02114 RE: Open Meeting Law Investigation Dear Attorney Stern: The Attorney General's Office initiated an investigation of the seventeen-member Commission (the "Commission

The Environmental Protection Division of the Attorney Generals Office is aware of the settlement agreement and the outcome reached in the agreement but did not participate in the mediation between GE, the EPA and the Committee. 3 2 The Board met in executive session for approximately twenty minutes and reviewed the settlement agreement initially approved by the Committee.

The Environmental Protection Division of the Attorney Generals Office is aware of the settlement agreement and the outcome reached in the agreement but did not participate in the mediation between GE, the EPA and the Committee. 4 We note that the Board has released the executive session minutes of the February 4 meeting. 3 2 Southbridge, 376 Mass. 70, 72 (1978).

Werlins proposed response, which was seconded by Trust member Cindy Boundy, and the Trust unanimously voted to provide the proposed response to the Attorney Generals Office. Mr. Werlin then asked for a motion to adjourn which motion was made by Ms. Boundy and seconded by Ms. Napior. The Trust did not vote on this motion; rather, Mr. Werlin simply announced that the meeting was adjourned after the motion had been made and seconded.

Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Dear Attorney Treisman: I have received the petition of Geoffrey P. Wermuth, Esq. of Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP appealing the response of the Office of the Attorney General (AGO) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, 1OA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ).

HRD and the Attorney Generals Office had apparently a history of litigation over c 126 18A and had court decisions interpreting the language of the statute. Admittedly, the Sheriff's Office had interpreted the language differently from HRD. HRD interprets Assault Pay to be the difference between a correction officer's Workers Compensation pay, the average weekly wage, and his straight salary.