Pending Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. With respect to records requests numbered 1, 2 and 5, these requested records are the subjects of a disputein activelitigation. See Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Durgin] served in the Action .... " Whereas the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) (the Supervisor may deny an appeal if, in the opinion of the Supervisor, "the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation").
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. With respect to records requests numbered 1, 2 and 5, these requested records are the subjects of a disputein activelitigation. See Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
The Department further stated the following: 950 CMR 32.08, allows withholding of police reports and BWC videos if those the records in question are the subject of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. Which in this case they are. Using a public request to get materials for court is prohibited. However, the materials you requested could be made available through the discovery process.
Gaudreau Page 3 July 27, 2023 SPR23/1629 Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian. Scott et al. v.
The Departments July 14th response In its July 14, 2023 response, the Department stated the following: In response to your requests referenced above as 1, 2, and 5, although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or
See 950 CMR 32.08 (supervisor of records may deny an appeal of public records in question that are subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation). See also, Lafferty v. Martha's Vineyard Commission, 17 Mass.L.Rptr. 501 (2004) (stating that records concerning ongoing litigation or administrative proceedings are exempt from disclosure pursuant to exemption (d))" (emphasis in original).
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. With respect to records requests numbered 1 and 5, these requested records are the subjects of a disputein activelitigation. See Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.