On January 29, 2025, Attorney Gildea requested, [a]ll settlement agreements and/or other agreements concerning the separation of employment of any employee(s) or commissioner(s) from the Cannabis Control Commission since September 1, 2022. Prior Appeals This request was the subject of prior appeals. See SPR25/0718 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (April 2, 2025) and SPR25/1070 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (May 1, 2025).

On January 29, 2025, Attorney Gildea requested, [a]ll settlement agreements and/or other agreements concerning the separation of employment of any employee(s) or commissioner(s) from the Cannabis Control Commission since September 1, 2022. Prior Appeal This request was the subject of a prior appeal. See SPR25/0718 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (April 2, 2025).

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SUP-17-5886 In the interest of moving forward, the University of Massachusetts Medical School (Employer) and AFSCME Council 93 (Union) agree to not to litigate Department of Labor Relations (DLR) case number SUP-17-5886 and agree as follows: 1. This is a settlement to resolve disputed claims and this Settlement Agreement does not constitute an admission of liability.

Fa Yes L No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Joseph DeLorey 617-367-6035 AFSCME Council 93 19.

allegations on February 18, 2021.1 Based on the evidence presented during this investigation, I find probable cause to believe that a violation of the Law occurred.2 Therefore, this Complaint of Prohibited Practice shall issue, and the parties I conducted the investigation remotely pursuant to Governor Bakers teleworking directive to executive branch employees. 1 2 On February 16, 2021, MassDOT filed a motion to dismiss the Charge and referenced settlement

On May 3, 2019, the Employer bargained in bad faith bargaining by; (1) repudiating a settlement agreement it had reached concerning the alleged overpayments and the conversion of a salaried employee to an hourly one; and (2) appointing a negotiator without disclosing limitations on his authority. By these and other acts, the parly complained of has interfered with, restrained, and/or coerced rights guaranteed by the Law.

Cl Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15,04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact UFCW, Local 1459 19. c/o David Rome 20. Telephone Number , 617-367-7200 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

Exemption (c) -settlement/severance agreement and audit report You indicated that the Town is withholding the agreement between the Town and a specifically-named former employee and the financial audit report as "personnel" records pursuant to the first clause of Exemption (c) of the Public Records Law.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been -made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual , Employer (E): 40. Name Palmer Teachers Association Employee Organization (O), ite) | 41. Representative to contact Jennifer MacDougall _ (42.

Association (the.Association) and the Respondent Palmer School Committee {the School Committee) have entered into a Settlement Agreeinent,, dated October 18, 2017, aver the allegations. set forth in the Assoeiations Charge of Prohibited Practice.in the above-captioned matier (DLR: Case No.

The Respondent says that reasonable settlement efforts have not yet occurred, and that the parties have been in discussions to commence said discussions.

MUP-16-5264 Settlement Agreement Between National Correctional Officers Union, Local 106 And Franklin County Sheriffs Department August 22, 2016 The parties in the above captioned matter agree to the following resolution: ' The National Correctional Officers Union, Local 106(Union) agrees to withdraw case number MUP-16-5264 with prejudice.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): 41. Representative to 40. Name National Correctional Employees Union, Local 106 contact Lan T.

By the above actions, the City failed to bargain in good faith with the Union and derivatively interfered with, restrained, and coerced employees in the exercise of their rights by repudiating Article IV of the parties' CBA and the parties' 2013 settlement agreement. The City subcontracted bargaining unit work without requiring the subcontractor PCI to assume the CBA.

.: MUP-14-4211 AUTHORITY ee SOMERVILLE 2 In the Matter of TEAMSTERS, FRR RRR RRR KKK ee and LOCAL 25 KERR IKI RIK IK KIKI IK IK KKK R IK RIK TOR IRR IRI Settlement Agreement Teamsters, Local 25 (Union) and the Somerville Housing Authority (SHA) agree to the following terms in settlement of MUP-14-4211: 1. SHA Police Chief Hal Curtis shall remain in the bargaining unit represented by SEIU, Local 888. 2.

a Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Teamsters Local Union 25 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.

Herman requested, copies of any and all settlement agreements, exit agreements, separation agreements, letter agreements, and/or the like executed by the Department of Transportation (DOT) and DOT employees for the period June 1, 2023 to the present. Previous Appeal This request was the subject of a previous appeal. See SPR24/1198 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (April 23, 2024).