Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination Boston Office: One Ashburton Place, Room 601 Boston, MA 02108 (617)-994-6000 New Bedford office 800 Purchase Street, Room 501 New Bedford, MA 02740 (508)-990-2390 Website http:/Awww.mass.gov/mcad 37 FE Emplo nt O tunii mmission Boston Office:475 Government Center Boston, MA 02203 1-800-669-4000 Website: http://www.eeoc.gov/boston/index.html DATE:__ 9/22/09 BOARD OF SELECTMEN BY: _Matthew P.
Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination Boston Office: One Ashburton Piace, Room 601 Boston, MA 02108 (617)-994-6000 New Bedford office 800 Purchase Street, Room 501 New Bedford, MA 02740 (508)-990-2390 Website hitp://www.mass.gov/mead 37 Equal Employment Opportuni ommissio Boston Office:475 Government Center Boston, MA 02203 1-800-669-4000 Website: http://www.eeoc.gov/boston/index. html DATE:__ 9/22/09 BOARD OF SELECTMEN BY: _Matthew P.
Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, 431 Mass. 655 (2000). 2 Insofar as the CERB believes the Charging Party has raised direct evidence of discrimination, the Respondent denies any such evidence is direct evidence. 5 support of this contention is the April 24 memo from Ferullo . . . this memo does not restrict Bissonnette as alleged but instead request that the observations are done preferably between 12 pm and 1pm.
Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, 431 Mass. 655 (2000). 6 Insofar as the DLR believes the Charging Party has raised direct evidence of discrimination, the Respondent denies any such evidence is direct evidence. 14 administrative leave, the transfer to Chelsea, and the job duties of meal tax auditors, happened because of a November 2016 communication between the Union and Respondent.
The allegations set forth in Paragraph 7 are admitted. ' Duffy has also filed a charge of discrimination with the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, essentially based on the same set of facts. There, he alleges here that all of his troubles with the Police Department are the result of his age.
By way of further answer, annually, on January 1, an officer ' Duffy has also filed a charge of discrimination with the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, essentially based on the same set of facts. There, he alleges here that all of his troubles with the Police Department are the result of his age.
By way of further answer, annually, on January 1, an officer ' Duffy has also filed a charge of discrimination with the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, essentially based on the same set of facts. There, he alleges here that all of his troubles with the Police Department are the result of his age.
It is 9 inconceivable that the HO and CERB ruled as they did with this evidence of perjury by these four individuals in the record, committed by this recidivist-offender Respondent that was already under a Cease and Desist Order by the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination for retaliating against faculty. 10.
Bryan also filed charges with the DLR,one of which in particular the hearing officer took administrative notice.3 Bryan also filed a complaint with the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination addressing, amongst other things, the same issues that were raised in the instant matter.(See Respondent's Exhibit #1).
As further evidence of the retaliatory history of the Respondent, the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination in DOCKET NO. 05-BEM-02717 issued a Cease and Desist Order against Respondent for unlawful retaliation against a Bridgewater State University faculty member, in violation of M.G.L. c. 151B 4(4). Thus, and incredibly, the Respondent was willing to vigorously and unlawfully retaliate against Dr.
The University was the subject of a complaint for discrimination on the basis of age and unlawful retaliation at the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination. After public hearing, the MCAD found the University to have retaliated against the faculty member and an Order was entered that the University immediately cease and desist from engaging in unlawful retaliation. See MCAD and Joseph Nicolson v.
(App.Exhs.48, 49) On January 7, 2022 the Appellant filed a Charge of Discrimination against the CFD with the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination (MCAD) and the Equal 32 Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which he later amended on January 10, 2022.
Kennedy Federal Building 475 Government Center, Boston, MA 02203 Tel: (800) 669-4000; Fax: (617) 565-3196; TTY: 1-(800) 669- 6820 iii, Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination (MCAD) One Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108 . Tel: (617) 994-6000; Fax: (617) 994-6024 iv.
(BNA) 243,169 Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, and stated something to the effect that he would turn the place upside down. In response, the department retained an attorney on February 16, 2016, to conduct an independent investigation of Officer Gutwill's accusations.
ARTICLE 23 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY & NON-DISCRIMINATION 23.1 The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to all Employees regardless of race, sex, color, age, national origin residency or membership, or non-membership in the Association. 23.2 Any Employee who files any complaint before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of the United States Government, the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, or the Pittsfield Human Rights Commission
Any person who files a discrimination or retaliation claim at the Massachusetts Commission AgainstDiscrimination, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission, any court, or any other forum shall have no recourse to the grievance and arbitration procedure set forth in Article 3 with regard to the employment actions or subject matters on which the claim is based.