We would note that the Attorney Generals office is seeking to amend the regulations to allow for the release of this information. Although the comment period for these amendments has been completed, the amendments have not yet been approved; if the William J. Doyle, Esq. Page 4 December 18, 2023 SPR23/2912; SPR23/2915 amendments are approved, this information will again be available by means of a public records request. The nature of Mr.

We would note that the Attorney Generals office is seeking to amend the regulations to allow for the release of this information. Although the comment period for these amendments has been completed, the amendments have not yet been approved; if the William J. Doyle, Esq. Page 4 December 18, 2023 SPR23/2912; SPR23/2915 amendments are approved, this information will again be available by means of a public records request. The nature of Mr.

Given that the redactions described above are based on the Open Meeting Law, and an interpretation of the Open Meeting Law falls within the authority of the Attorney Generals Office (AGO) and not this office, I am unable to address those issues in this determination. See G. L. c. 30A, 23. Consequently, I encourage the parties to contact the AGO for a determination concerning the Open Meeting Law issues.

See G.L. c. 30A, 23(b); 940 CMR 29.05. 3 We note that the official notice posting location for the City that is on record with the Attorney Generals Office is a physical location in or on the municipal building where the Clerks office is located. In subsequent communication with our office, the Complainant noted that the only place he found notice for the February 6 executive session was on the Citys website.

Given that an interpretation of the Open Meeting Law falls within the authority of the Attorney Generals Office (AGO) and not this office, I am unable to address those issues in this determination. See G. L. c. 30A, 23. I encourage the parties to contact the AGO for a resolution of the Open Meeting Law issues. Conclusion Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr.

Arjun Jaikumar is an employee of the Attorney Generals Office. The complaint contains no allegations that are specific to the actions of Mr. Jaikumar, and Mr.

Brillhart presented the Resolution, Acting Chair William Doherty5 asked the Commissioners 3 The division of the Attorney General's Office that would review such a request is not the same division tasked with reviewing this complaint. 4 The complaint argues that the Commissioners' review of Resolution 13-06 may have been improper because the Resolution was not a matter that it was required to review.