17 documents · ·Essex, MA ·No Responsive Documents Boston Retirement Bd., 388 Mass. 427, 438 (1983); Brogan v. School Committee of Westport, 401 Mass. 306, 308 (1987). Indeed, specifically with respect to disciplinary documentation related or resulting from a Police Department internal affairs investigation, the courts had determined that such documentation is exempt from disclosure under Exemption (c). See, e.g., Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp. v. Chief of Police of Worcester, 58 Mass. App.
Wallack requested [c]opies of termination/resignation letters for sworn officers within the Cambridge Police Department who the Cambridge police command staff and/or Cambridge city attorneys recall were terminated or resigned/retired to resolve misconduct accusations since January 1, 2010. Mr. Wallack further stated that [a]lternatively, if it is easier, [the City] could also satisfy this request by providing a list of the officer names.
Murray Supervisor of Records Lieutenant Antonio Ayala Cambridge Police Department 125 Sixth Street Cambridge, MA 02142 April 14, 2022 SPR22/0757 Dear Lieutenant Ayala: I have received the petition of Grace Ferguson of WBUR appealing the nonresponse of the Cambridge Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On March 17, 2022, Ms.
2 documents · ·Town of Milford ·Fulfilled
Sincerely , S Sy 077 Sergeant James Heron |1 | | MIFOR, POLICE DEPARTMENT ichael A. Pighetti Chief of Police 250 Main|Street * Milford, MA 01757 * Tel (508) 473-1113 * Fax (508) 473-5087 mpighetti@milfordpolice.org TO: Michael A. Pighetti | Chief of Police FROM: James F.
Walsh, Mayor September 7, 2016 Edward Srednicki, Executive Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1 Floor Boston, MA 02114 Re: BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION AND BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION vs.
.: ASSOCIATION * November 29, 2016 and * and BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS MUP-16-5315 MUP-16-5350 Date Issued: BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION HARKER EEEEERREREEREEEEKERERRERKEKKEKRKRREREE RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS BACKGROUND On June 23, 2016, the Boston Police Patrolmens Association (Association) filed a Charge of Prohibited Practice, alleging that the City of Boston (City) violated Sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(5) of Chapter 150E of Massachusetts
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS HAKKAR RERREEREKEEEREREEEEEEREEEEREEEEEERREEEEEEEREE In the Matter of * CITY OF BOSTON * * * * * * and BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION and Case Nos.: MUP-16-5315 MUP-16-5350 Date Issued: November 29, 2016 * BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION KHER EEKEREREKEKRERERKEEKKEEREEKEKREKEREEREERERERKEK RULING ON MOTION TO BIFURCATE BACKGROUND On June 23, 2016, the Boston Police Patrolmens
. : MUP-16-5315 MUP-16-5350 Date Issued: August 30, 2018 HF FH FF CITY OF BOSTON * F and & FF F BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION + FF and + ** + BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION KEKEKKKKREEREAEKKAAAKKKEAKEKEKKEEEEKRKEREKEKEKEEEEEEEREREEEE Board Members Participating: Marjorie F. Wittner, Chair Katherine G.
MUP-16-5315 MUP-16-5350 * BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION * * * and * BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION * * Date Issued: August 16, 2017 Hearing Officer: Kerry Bonner, Esq.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS In the Matter of BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION, BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION, Charging Parties, and CITY OF BOSTON, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MUP-16-5315 and MUP-16-5350 CHARGING PARTYS OPPOSITION TO CITYS FRIVOLOUS MOTION TO DISMISS The City of Boston, with little justification, again circulates wholly inapposite precedence to seek dismissal of this case
Ombudsmen will attend a preliminary training session prior to beginning their review of internal affairs cases. This training will be formulated by designees of the Boston Police Commissioner, and approved by the Mayor. The training will include, but is not limited to, the internal affairs process, Boston Police Department Rules and Regulations, constitutional law, and general police procedures ARTICLE IV.
OPAT Staff will perform the necessary investigative functions to resolve concerns and complaints about matters related to civilian concerns and complaints for the CRB and Boston PoliceInternal Affairs for the IAOP. 2.
Name Boston Police Superior Officers Federation 18. Telephone Number 617-367-7200 1 19,20,21,22. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 2 Liberty Sq., 10th Floor Boston MA 02109 23. FAX Number 617-367-4820 EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION'S LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE 24. Name Patrick N. Bryant 25. Telephone Number 5037055036 26,27,28,29.
On November 11, 2009, Captain Mark Hayes of the Boston Police Department wrote a memorandum to the Deputy Superintendent of the Bureau of Investigative Services recommending that the Internal Affairs Division conduct a complete, in-depth and thorough investigation of whether Officer Ricci was guilty of untruthfulness, abuse of process, and withholding evidence for her rape allegation. This memorandum is attached as Exhibit 1.
Employee Organization (if any): Boston Police Patrolman's Association 8. 7. Representative to contact 9. Telephone Number Amy Laura Davidson 617-523-2500 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) Sandulli Grace, P.C. 10. Fax Number 517-523-2523 11. This charge is filed against (check one) 12.
Employee Organization (if any): Boston Police Patrolman's Association 8. 7. Representative to contact 9. Telephone Number Amy Laura Davidson 617-523-2500 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) Sandulli Grace, P.C. 10. Fax Number 517-523-2523 11. This charge is filed against (check one) 12.
Walsh, Mayor September 7, 2016 Edward Srednicki, Executive Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Labor Relations 19 Staniford Street, 1 Floor Boston, MA 02114 Re: BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION AND BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION vs.
.: ASSOCIATION * November 29, 2016 and * and BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS MUP-16-5315 MUP-16-5350 Date Issued: BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION HARKER EEEEERREREEREEEEKERERRERKEKKEKRKRREREE RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS BACKGROUND On June 23, 2016, the Boston Police Patrolmens Association (Association) filed a Charge of Prohibited Practice, alleging that the City of Boston (City) violated Sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(5) of Chapter 150E of Massachusetts
. : MUP-16-5315 MUP-16-5350 Date Issued: August 30, 2018 HF FH FF CITY OF BOSTON * F and & FF F BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION + FF and + ** + BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION KEKEKKKKREEREAEKKAAAKKKEAKEKEKKEEEEKRKEREKEKEKEEEEEEEREREEEE Board Members Participating: Marjorie F. Wittner, Chair Katherine G.
MUP-16-5315 MUP-16-5350 * BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION * * * and * BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION * * Date Issued: August 16, 2017 Hearing Officer: Kerry Bonner, Esq.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS In the Matter of BOSTON POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS FEDERATION, BOSTON POLICE PATROLMENS ASSOCIATION, Charging Parties, and CITY OF BOSTON, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MUP-16-5315 and MUP-16-5350 CHARGING PARTYS OPPOSITION TO CITYS FRIVOLOUS MOTION TO DISMISS The City of Boston, with little justification, again circulates wholly inapposite precedence to seek dismissal of this case