L Yes | L No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING 18. Name 19. Representative to contact Massport Firefighters, Local S-2, I.A.F.F. 20. PARTY 21.

The Department administratively closed the case until February 14, 2012 for the parties to pursue potential settlement of the matter. On February 13, 2012, the Union advised that the parties are still in settlement discussions, but have not yet resolved the. matter. Therefore, in response to the Union's assented-to request, the Department will administratively close the case for an additional 90 days without prejudice.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): | lO | 40. Name 41. Representative to contact |42.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 4.

Thank you [Emphasis in original] 16 The Memorandum of Agreement On July 30, 2013, Johnson sent a proposed settlement agreement to Maher via email,' and Maher subsequently reviewed it. In an August 2, 2016, email message, Maher replied in relevant part that: | have reviewed the MOA, and | am sorry to say | do have some concerns. The first sentence ... Without prejudice to the Citys management rights, What is this about?

Yes [| No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name Teamsters Local 25 20. 19. Representative to contact 21. Telephone Number Michael A.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

The rationale behind the policy is to encourage the prompt and effective settlement of public sector disputes utilizing binding grievance and 10 arbitration procedures and to employ arbitrators with an expertise in contract analysis and interpretation. City of Boston, 1 MLC 1228 (1974). The instant case is appropriate for deferral.

Yes a No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Name 19. Representative to contact Massport Firefighters, Local S-2, [AFF 20. 21. Telephone Number Scott W.

The rights of the Authority and employees shall be respected and the provisions of this Agreement for the orderly settlement of all questions regarding such rights shall be observed. Section 2.

The rationale behind the policy is to encourage the prompt and effective settlement of public sector disputes utilizing binding grievance and arbitration procedures and to employ arbitrators with an expertise in contract analysis and interpretation. City of Boston, 1 MLC 1228 (1974). The instant case is appropriate for deferral.

Free Cash/reserves; . mean residential income; debt/projected expenses; 14) _ other settlements in the municipality and-in other comparable communities for employees similarly situated; and changes in any of the foregoing circumstances during the pendency of the dispute. 15) In comparable property tax rates; 10) 11) 12) 13) formulating its award, the panel applied all of the statutory elements to the evidence, The panel reviewed and applied relevant

. | When the grievance was reached for hearing at arbitration, the parties entered into a settlement agreement on August 15, 2016. 35. The settlement agreement called for the parties to reclassify Ms. Teixeira-Araujos position as a Grade 5 coordinator, working a 220-day work year for 20162017 pending the parties negotiations over the establishment of part-time positions in BASASs bargaining unit.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): O 40. Name M.O.S.E.S. 42. Telephone Number 617-367-2727 41.

The record does not establish the status of these grievances. 16 The parties stipulated that this meeting occurred on August 30, 2016. 17 At the hearing, the Commonwealth, after requesting a recess to consider its position on this document, did not object to this proposed offer of settlement entering into evidence.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

Herman requested . . . copies of any and all settlement agreements, severance agreements, separation agreements, exit agreements, and/or the like that Massport has executed with employees. This is for the period January 1, 2015 to the present. The Authority responded on August 16, 2021, providing a fee estimate. Objecting to the fees, Mr. Herman petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR21/2092, was opened as a result.

Herman requested" ... hard copies and electronic copies of any and all settlement agreements, exit agreements, severance agreements, separation agreements, and/or the like executed with former employees by the [MBTA]." Mr. Herman mentioned that "[t]his is for the period January 1, 2018 to the present." The MBTA responded on July 1, 2019, providing a fee estimate. Objecting to the fee, Mr.

Quemere inquired [t]his list does not contain docket numbers, settlement amounts, and other information one might expect such a database to have. Are these the complete data? On September 11, 2020, Mr. Quemere further inquired if the Department is . . . able to provide me with the original spreadsheet this data was extracted from?