The Departments April 18th response In its April 18, 2023 response, the Department stated: Although the Northbridge Police Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
The Departments April 28th response In its April 28, 2023, response, the Department stated: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
The Departments April 19th response In its April 19, 2023 response, the Department stated: The responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
However, it is unclear how the requested records are directly related to the litigation or are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation. The Town must clarify this matter. Further, in her appeal, Ms. Lessard indicates that after her inspection on 10/10/18, she left a handwritten list of files she tagged. Ms. Lessard claims that she has not received copies of these records yet. As such, this office encourages the Town and Ms.
However, it is unclear how the requested records are directly related to the litigation or are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation. The Town must clarify this matter. Further, in her appeal, Ms. Lessard indicates that after her inspection on 10/10/18, she left a handwritten list of files she tagged. Ms. Lessard claims that she has not received copies of these records yet. As such, this office encourages the Town and Ms.
Active Administrative Proceeding 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: The Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Reconsideration Appeal In his September 17th reconsideration request, Mr.
Active Administrative Proceeding 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: The Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. In light of the pending matter, I decline to opine on these matters at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b).
Pending litigation In her appeal petition, Attorney.Botarro states that there is a pending criminal case, 1831 CR003239, as well as her clients' pending civil lawsuit regarding this matter. 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Following his request for reconsideration, in an email to this office on June 2, 2025, Mr.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Subsequent to the opening of this appeal, on May 7, 2025, Mr.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Subsequent to the opening of this appeal, on May 7, 2025, Mr.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Following his request for reconsideration, in an email to this office on June 2, 2025, Mr.
Active Litiga tion 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. With respect to records requests 1, 2, and 5, these requested records are the subjects of a disputein active litigation. See Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
The records you seek are relate to the subject matter of active litigation .... " Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation.