The Departments April 19" response In its April 19, 2023 response, the Department stated: The responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation... it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of some of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold these records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administ rative hearings, or mediation. | support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of some of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold these records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. | support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
I followed up on 1 May 2023 as the request had not received a response, and on 9 May 2023 I received a denial of all records from Peter Dziadose, which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
I will note, however, that last year, several departments refused to provide these responsive records citing to 950 CMR 32.08, claiming that the records in question were the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. Regarding a request for all police department data submitted to POST, POST withheld all responsive records, citing to the pending litigation in Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
The Department states that it intends to withhold the records in their entirety ... as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
The Department stated, [w]e are denying your records request in accordance with 950 CMR 32.08 whereas the records requested are subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
The Department stated, [w]e are denying your records request in accordance with 950 CMR 32.08 whereas the records requested are subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Montague, MA Public Record Request Number:2023-0052 Requester: Jeff Raymond Request Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9:58:00 AM Response Due Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Dear Jeff Raymond: Although this Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative
dated [insert date] Response of Records Access Officer Dear [Requester]: On [insert date], we received your request pursuant to the Massachusetts Public Records Law for the following records: [insert requested records here] Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of dispute
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records , the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32 .08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation , administrative hearings , or mediation . I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
and/or officers and/or employees of the police department between the dates of May 1, 2022 and April 14, 2023 that make reference to and/or cite, in whole or in part, the following sentences (as they appear in said records, designated with quotation marks (example: Public Records), broadly construed. the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2); the responsive records in question are the subjects of dispute
"the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2)" "the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation" I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department" and/or "In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department" Item 1 Search Terms: Date On or After 2022-05-01 AND Date On or Before 2023-04-14 AND ( All:the Department intends to withhold the records in their
"the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2)" "the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation" "I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department" and/or "In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department" Copies of any responsive communications sent or received by municipal employees and/or officers and/or employees of the police department between the
This request was received on April 10, 2023 Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
The Departments May 2nd Response In its May 2, 2023 response, the Department advised, [a]lthough the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
On 14 April 2023, I received a denial of all records from Chief of Police Daniel Dowd, which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.