A stand-alone 10(a)(1) violation does not require proof of See Town ofChelmsford, 8 MLC 1913 (1982), aff'd sub nom. Town of Chelmsford y. Labor Relations Commission, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983).
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OFCHELMSFORD AND LOCAL 877 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS CEMETERY FY2014 through FY2016 Article 1. Recognition . c.sercsr s escers sce nse cs caseusanoesoe ncas Article 2. Participation in Unions.... Article 3. Non-Discrimimation............cscsccsesssssssssosssssseseses Article 4. Voluntary Deduction from Wages......c.....ssssssssssssscssescescesessesersee Article 5. Union Representative. Article 6.
Mazurczyk requested six ...copies of responses you received from the Town ofChelmsford in response to [the] following determinations. [1.] SPR21/2739 dated October 26, 2021 and all other pertinent responses to the original request for records[;] [2.] SPR21/2816 dated November 5, 2021[;] [3.] SPR22/0537 dated March 17, 2022[;] [4.] SPR23/1001 dated May 25, 2023[;] [5.] SPR23/1314 dated June 29, 2023[;] [6.] SPR23/1555 dated July 20, 2023[;] [7.]
The Board does not analyze either the motivation behind the conduct, Town ofChelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916, MUP-4620 (March 12, 1982), affd sub nom., Town of Chelmsford v. Labor Relations Commission, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983), or whether the coercion succeeded or failed, Groton-Dunstable Regional School Committee, 15 MLC 1551, 1555-56, MUP-6748 (March 20, 1989).
Town ofChelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916, MUP-4620 (March 12, 1982), affd sub nom., Town of Chelmsford v. Labor Relations Commission, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983), or whether the coercion succeeded or failed. Groton-Dunstable Regional School Committee, 15 MLC 1551, 1555-1556, MUP-6748 (March 20, 1989).
.; Town ofChelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916 (1982), affd sub nom., Town of Chelmsford v. Labor Relations Commission, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983), nor whether the coercion succeed or failed. Groton-Dunstable 1556 (1989).
Sullivan 2015): As the CERB recognized in Town ofChelmsford, supervisors are presumed to be acting and speaking for the employer, even when the employer has instructed the supervisor to refrain from such action, so long as the employers instructions have not been communicated to employees. Town of Chelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916, MUP-4620 (March 12, 1982), affd, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983.
Town ofChelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916 (1982). The Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (Board) does not analyze either the motivation behind the employer's conduct, Town of Chelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916 (1982), aff'd sub nom., 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983), or whether the coercion succeeded or failed. Groton-Dunstable Regional School Committee, 15 MLC at 1555-1556.
The CERB does not analyze the motivation behind the conduct, Town ofChelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916, MUP-4620 (March 12, 1982), aff'd sub nom. Town of Chelmsford v. Labor Relations Commission, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983), or whether the coercion succeeded or failed. Groton-Dunstable Regional School Committee, 15 MLC 1551, 1556, MUP-6748 (March 20, 1989).
Town ofChelmsford, 8 MLC 1913, 1916, MUP-4620 (March 12, 1982), affd sub nom. Town of Chelmsford v. Labor Relations Commission, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (1983), or whether the coercion succeeded or failed. Groton-Dunstable Regional School Committee, 15 MLC 1551, 1555-1556, MUP-6478 (March 20, 1989).