Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 371-376 of 376 in total
11 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Suffolk County Sheriff's Department, 27 MLC 155, 159, MUP- Finally, if the employer produces one or more lawful reasons for 31 The Union also argues that Callahans refusal to allow Menino to act as Gracias union steward, as described below, is further evidence of the Citys improper motivation.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
AFSCME, COUNCIL 93 / PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
15 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
In the case of employees of the Suffolk county sheriff's department, employer shall mean the sheriff of Suffolk county or any individual who is designated by him to represent him or act in his interest in dealing with such employees. In the case of personal care attendants as defined in section 70 of chapter 118E, the employer shall mean the PCA quality home care workforce council or its designee as defined in section 71 of chapter 118E.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Vincent Durante / Board of Higher Education
7 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Compare Suffolk County Sheriff's Department, 27 MLC 155, 159, MUP-1498 (June 4, 2001) (continuing violation where employer actions punished a bargaining unit member on a day-to-day basis), with Wakefield School Committee, 27 MLC 9, 10, MUP2441 (August 16, 2000) (no continuing violation where suspension was a discrete action).
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Falmouth Firefighters, Local 1397 / Falmouth, Town of
9 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Suffolk County Sheriff's Department, 30 MLC 1, 6, MUP-2747 (August 19, 2003). On June 15, 2016, the DLR issued the Amended Complaint in MUP-15-4913. letter to Moschos dated June 28, 2016, Barrault stated: By Complaint and Partial Dismissal (contd.)
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Sylvie Sinapah / University of Massaschusetts
10 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Suffolk County Sheriff's Department, 27 MLC at 160; Quincy School Committee, 27 MLC at 92. The charging party has failed to provide grounds in her appeal to reach such a conclusion. While she cites the technical feasibility of altering a sponsorship record once it has been closed, she does not overcome the overwhelming evidence that to pursue such a course of action is not a business practice encouraged or endorsed by DOS.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
AFSCME, LOCAL 1703 / BURLINGTON, TOWN OF
11 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
In the case of employees of the Suffolk county sheriff's department, employer shall mean the sheriff of Suffolk county or any individual who is designated by him to represent him or act in his interest in dealing with such employees. In the case of personal care attendants as defined in section 28 of chapter 118G, the employer shall mean the PCA quality home care workforce council or its designee as defined in section 29 of said chapter 118G.
Displaying items 371-376 of 376 in total