Based on the evidence produced during this investigation, I have decided to dismiss the charge in its entirety for the reasons explained below. 1 At the in-person investigation, I allowed the Union to amend its charge to include allegations that the City repudiated the collective bargaining agreement and a settlement agreement.
Teixeira requested "[s]ettlement agreements entered into by your School District with parents and guardians, from January 1, 2011 through today, relative to the provision of special education services and/or educational placement(s) for students with disabilities, redacted of all personally identifiable information."
Teixeira requested "[s]ettlement agreements entered into by your School District with parents and guardians, from January 1, 20 11 through today, relative to the provision of special education services and/or educational placement(s) for students with disabilities, redacted of all personally identifiable information."
school, was suspended for 26, 2005, punishment Wilson his form filed in a his for With the Association through Level and Wilson options ultimately retaliation by the II its duty 1:28 Employment decision of refused school the to part-time days a to dismiss at Woburn fair Woburn (WTA), settle, starting on October class officer On November public schools of private Wilson hearings Woburn teacher student's class. grievance with a assistance Teacher's settlement
With the assistance of private counsel and the Woburn Teacher's Association (WTA), Wilson pursued his grievance through Level I and II grievance hearings and also explored settlement options with the Woburn school committee (committee). Wilson ultimately refused to settle, expressing concerns about retaliation by the school administration.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT MUP-19-7409, MUP-19-7410 . In the interest of moving forward, the Fall River Housing Authority (Employer) and AFSCME Council 93 (Union) agree not to litigate Department of Labor Relations (DLR) case numbers MUP-19- 7409, MUP19-7410. . The parties expressly understand and agree that this is a settlement to resolve a disputed claim. This Settlement Agreement does not constitute an admission of liability or fact. .
lv] Yes LJ No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name AFSCME 19. Council 93 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Joseph DeLorey 617-367-6035 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
The Union argues that recent wage settlements show that the region has recovered from the great recession and communities have provided wage increases to attract and retain their police officers. The Union further argues that the wage settlements provided to other bargaining units in the City of Quincy should not be controlling in this proceeding.
Manner of Settlement in Last Two Contract Negotiations Bargaining Agreement. 44. Petition Submitted By: [L]abor Organization [E]mployer [J]ointly L 45. Signature Of Petitioning Party 46. Title Attorney 47. Date 48. Signature of Principal Representative of Other Party if Joint Petition 49. Title 50.
Spaulding alleges that the notice for the Committees February 25 meeting was insufficiently detailed, as the topic Discussion of Legal Settlements under SUPERINTENDENTS REPORT did not identify the specific legal matters to be discussed.2 Following our review, we find that the Committee did not violate the Open Meeting Law.
After the parties expressed an interest in resolving the dispute through settlement, | held a telephone status conference on June 6, 2017. On that same day, | referred the case to a DLR mediator to assist the parties in settlement discussions. Since the parties have been unable to reach resolution of the dispute, | hereby make the following probable cause determination.
Settlement of grievances. 38. (a) Have you attempted to settle this case? ly| (b) If not, why not? Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY wad 40.
As detailed in the dismissal letter, Baker corresponded with the Union from 2014 to 2015, discussing the status of his grievances, his desire to obtain a global settlement from DDS for all five grievances, and Bakers preference, in the event a satisfactory global settlement was not reached, that the grievances go to a Step 3 hearing rather than arbitration, to provide the Union with the opportunity to hear DDS side of the story.
Baker and potential to resolve those matters as demonstrated in Charging Party x2, and Charging Party x3, with the result of settlement discussions being that the employing department was uninterested in resolving the matters (see Charging Party x6). The Union through Mr. Bernard also attempted to secure additional information from Mr. Baker for review of the grievances involving Mr. Baker, but Mr. Baker did not provide Mr.
Moser's union and the University reached a settlement of the grievance filed on Dr. Moser's behalf based upon the glaring procedural deficiencies and impermissible bias that pervaded the initial departmental personnel committee process. The MSP ADMITS that the MSP and the University reached a settlement on Dr. Mosers grievance which established a de novo Personnel Committee review of Dr. Mosers bid for reappointment for a third year.
Moser filed a grievance disputing the Committees recommendation against her reappointment. 2011 The Union reached a Settlement Agreement with the Employer in August and the two parties agreed to initiate a de novo review process in The parties agreed the connection with Moser's reappointment recommendation. Committee would complete another review process regarding Moser and submit a recommendation on or before September 2, 2011.
Mackin was provided with a requested copy of the Settlement Agreement between the identified person and the Town of Saugus School Committee (School Committee). On November 12, 2020, the School Committee voted to release the Executive Session Minutes, and those minutes were provided to Mr. Mackin. In a December 2, 2020 letter from Howard L. Greenspan, the School Committees Legal Counsel, Mr.
On September 28, 2020, the School provided a response, and included a copy of the settlement agreement pertaining to the identified person and identified litigation. See SPR20/1985 Determination of the Supervisor (October 29, 2020). Given that no violation of G. L. c. 66, 10 had been clearly asserted by Mr. Mackin in his appeal petition regarding SPR20/1985, I was unable to issue a determination at that time.
Srednicki: In accordance with the enclosed Settlement Agreement, the Union, SEIU, Local 509 hereby withdraws the above referenced Charges. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Jo Fletcher Assistant to Katherine D. Shea Enclosure ee: Ardith Wieworka, Child Development and Education, Inc.
Employer's improper acts have made settlement impossible. Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(7). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number | SEIU, Local 509 Katherine D. Shea, Esq. 617-367-7200 17. 19. 21.